From: Wang, Roger (Roger@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 18 2001 - 10:53:55 GMT-3
Is there something wrong with using this command:
queue-list 1 protocol dlsw 1
than the tcp port specific ones?
Rog
> -----Original Message-----
> From: BIKEMAN [mailto:krode@bigpond.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 3:01 AM
> To: Huang HaiBo; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: bandwidth lacation
>
>
> You have to assign DLSW to the ports needed 1981-83, 2065.
> Check the DLSW
> design guide for a great explanation on this (the 165 page version)
>
> Rudi
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Huang HaiBo" <huanghb@mdcl.com.cn>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 1:00 PM
> Subject: bandwidth lacation
>
>
> > Hi, all
> >
> > I have a question:
> >
> > How to location bandwidth in the serial 0, dlsw 50%, ip
> 25%, ipx 25%.
> And dlsw mixed size 512 bytes, ipx mixed size 1024 bytes, ip
> mixed size 256
> bytes.
> >
> > could I do like this:
> >
> > queue-list 1 protocol 1 tcp 2065
> > queue-list 1 protocol 1 tcp 2067
> > queue-list 1 protocol 1 ipx 2
> > queue-list 1 protocol 1 ip 3
> > queue-list 1 queue 1 byte-count 2048
> > queue-list 1 queue 2 byte-count 1024
> > queue-list 1 queue 3 byte-count 1024
> >
> > question is: Do I need default queue? DLSW can indicate
> like this?
> >
> > Huang
> > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:48 GMT-3