From: Walter Chen (wchen@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 18 2001 - 10:13:44 GMT-3
The "area x range" command won't work in this case because it won't change
the way directly connected networks are redistributed to IGRP. Using static
routes in this case is preferred because you only need four of them.
However, if you were asked to redistribute /20 OSPF into /28 IGRP (in this
case you have to configure 256 static routes!) or you were not allowed to
use static routes, then you could configure a separate major network with a
/24 mask in OSPF domain, say, 192.168.1.0/24 and redistribute it into IGRP.
>From the IGRP router, configure this network to be your default-network to
let you reach the OSPF 172.16.x.x/20 networks.
If you are now allowed to use either static or IGRP default-network, then
you're stuck.
Walter
-----Original Message-----
From: Michel GASPARD [mailto:mgaspard@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 8:12 AM
To: Alejandro Cadarso
Cc: ccielab
Subject: Re: Redistributing OSPF /22 to IGRP /24, same mayor network
Alejandro,
Did you already tried the "area x range" command?
Regards,
Michel
Alejandro Cadarso wrote:
>
> I'm playing with the following scenario and was unable to imagine how
> can I get 172.16.24.0/22 redistributed from ospf to igrp for r2
> inserting it in its routing table.
>
> Any suggestions will be appreciated. Of course neither Default routing
> nor static are allowed.
>
> ospf igrp loop0
> -------------r1------------------r2----172.16.6.0/24
>
> 172.16.24.0/22 172.16.36.0/24
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:48 GMT-3