From: David Siwula (DSiwula@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Apr 17 2001 - 17:04:16 GMT-3
Or we would just use good old eigrp.
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin, Chris [mailto:chris@pacinter.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 12:18 PM
To: louie kouncar; 'Wang, Roger'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: IGRP route advertisement
Louie I believe you are correct. IGRP is a classful routing protocol,
not
classless, therefore it doesnt support VLSM.
You would be able to advertise the route with redistribution in OSPF..
----- Original Message -----
From: "louie kouncar" <lkouncar@UU.NET>
To: "'Wang, Roger'" <Roger@inteqnet.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 11:59 AM
Subject: RE: IGRP route advertisement
> Wang,
>
> I don't think that you can do this, I think that with IGRP you kinda
have
to
> live with this issue and as far as I know, there is no solution due to
the
> limitation of IGRP.
>
>
>
> Louie J. Kouncar (CCIE)/Written
> TCO3 Senior Data Center Engineer
> UUNET
> W-703-343-6645
> C-703-304-2460
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Wang, Roger
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 2:22 PM
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: IGRP route advertisement
>
>
> Hi, all,
>
> I have searched high and low in the archive and can't seem to find
anything
> about it...
>
> I have a question about IGRP route advertisement. We all know that
the
> advertisements from IGRP are only with the mask of the interface:
>
> 172.16.77.4/25--e0(R4)s0--172.16.66.4/24
>
> R4 is running IGRP. Is there way so that the /25 subnet (e0) can be
> advertised out interface s0 (on /24 subnet)? The other end of s0 is a
> router running both IGRP and OSPF where redistribution occurs.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rog
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:48 GMT-3