From: Ramesh Ramasamy (ramesh_ramasamy@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Apr 17 2001 - 10:43:19 GMT-3
Michael,
I cant agree more with you. Yes - the second case of routing protocol.. took
me a while to really get the grasp of whats going on.
I wish the docs / books have put some BIG CAPITAL notes and an EXAMPLE
like the rest of the NOTE!.
say ...
NOTE:
-----------
explanation of the RP ... distribute list out
-----------
Ramesh.
>From: Michel GASPARD <mgaspard@cisco.com>
>Reply-To: Michel GASPARD <mgaspard@cisco.com>
>CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Distribute-list out: point of interest
>Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 10:17:22 +0200
>
>Dear all,
>
>During some redistribution tests, I noticed an intersting point. I guess
>most of you already know it, but maybe somebody not:
>
>When using the "distribute-list <ACL#> out", you can add:
>
>- an interface: the distribution-list ACL will only be applied on
>updates GOING OUT of that specified interface (sounds logical, nothing
>new)
>
>- a RP process: the distribution-list ACL will only be applied on
>updates COMING FROM that RP process (does not sound logical to me, but
>it is that way...)
>
>Regards,
>
>Michel
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:47 GMT-3