Re: IGRP Question

From: Darren Ward (dward@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Apr 16 2001 - 12:02:17 GMT-3


   
Hi Carlos,

No ip subnet-zero is enabled on all routers in the IGRP domain.

As mentioned the debug ip igrp transactions still shows that the 'edge' router
is not advertising the 172.16.0.0 address so its simply not redistributing it,
but even when I no passive the 172.16.0.1 interface it still won't advertise it
:(

The interface is definately up and I can ping across it so there's no reason
except for some weird IGRP issue.

As a not i changed it to another subnet /24 of the range and it does work so it
is something specific to the .0 subnet and yet ip subnet-zero and ip classless
are applied.... weird

I've tried rebooting, redistribute connected, redistribute from another protoco
l
and even simply including it in the IGRP domain but nothing works, IGRP only
advertises subnets and not the .0/24 subnet :(

Darren

Carlos Chorao wrote:

> Darren,
> Is s0/0.1 up? IGRP wont advertise the interface if its not. Going back to
> your original question my test show that the zero subnet 172.16.0.0 /24 is
> advertised by the edge router once the "ip subnet zero " is added to the
> configuration. Likewise all Remote routers receive the update but do not add
> the zero subnet (172.16.0.0 /24) to the routing table until "ip subnet zero
> "is added as well.
>
> Carlos Chorao
> CCNP,CCDP,MCSE,MCT
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Ward [mailto:dward@pla.net.au]
> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 6:23 PM
> To: lkidd@netstarnetworks.com
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: IGRP Question
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:47 GMT-3