From: Tariq Sharif (tariq_sharif@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Apr 15 2001 - 05:21:57 GMT-3
Atif
No I meant the other way around (R1's token ring 0 ONLY to allow traffic to
R1's ethernet LAN). I know that what you said DOES happen I was not sure if
the sam applies to the other direction.
Many thanks & regards.
Tariq Sharif
-----Original Message-----
From: Atif Awan [mailto:atifawan@hotmail.com]
Sent: 15 April 2001 01:13
To: tariq_sharif@btinternet.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: DLSw+ & Ring-Lists
I think you wanted to say that R2 only needs to communicate with one of the
token interfaces on R1. Yes this can be achieved by defining a ring list on
R1 :
dlsw ring-list 1 rings 1
and then apply this ring-list to the remote peer statement for R2 :
dlsw remote-peer 1 tcp ip-of-R2
Regards
Atif Awan
>From: "Tariq Sharif" <tariq_sharif@btinternet.com>
>Reply-To: "Tariq Sharif" <tariq_sharif@btinternet.com>
>To: "Ccielab@Groupstudy. Com" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: DLSw+ & Ring-Lists
>Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 22:37:23 +0100
>
>I'm trying to set-up DLSw+ between 2 routers. R1 has 2 token ring
>interfaces
>& connects to R2 over a serial link. R2 has an ethenet interface. I want R1
>to receive traffic from ONLY one of R2's token ring interfaces. If I place
>a ring-list on the required token ring interface of R1 will this achieve
>what I want? Any good references would be appreciated.
>
>Many thanks & regards.
>
>Tariq Sharif
>
>[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had
>a name of winmail.dat]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:46 GMT-3