From: YJC (stiff.yu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Apr 13 2001 - 00:10:41 GMT-3
same as before,unless I use dynamic in remote peer.
----- Original Message -----
From: taliv <taliv@insight.rr.com>
To: 'YJC' <stiff.yu@datacraft-asia.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 10:11 AM
Subject: RE: DLSW+
> Out of curiosity, change your dest-mac address to 2222.2222.3333 and see
if
> it still happens.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> YJC
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 9:42 PM
> To: Keith Leonard
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: DLSW+
>
>
> configration of r1 is
> dlsw local-peer peer-id 138.5.1.1
> dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 138.5.6.6 dest-mac 1111.2222.3333
> configration of r6 is
> dlsw local-peer peer-id 138.5.6.6 promiscuous
> r6#sh dlsw peers
> Peers: state pkts_rx pkts_tx type drops ckts TCP
> uptime
>
> TCP 138.5.1.1 CONNECT 3 3 prom 0 0 0
> 00:00:5
> r1#sh dlsw peer
> Peers: state pkts_rx pkts_tx type drops ckts TCP
> uptime
>
> TCP 138.5.6.6 CONNECT 4 4 conf 0 0 0
> 00:01:30
>
> Total number of connected peers: 1
> Total number of connections: 1
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Keith Leonard <Keith_Leonard@data3.com.au>
> To: YJC <stiff.yu@datacraft-asia.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 5:46 PM
> Subject: Re: DLSW+
>
>
> >
> > Is the connection coming up because of a remote peer statement on the
> other
> > end? Is the local peer in prom mode? Post your configs if not, so we can
> > have a look,
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Keith
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:45 GMT-3