From: adiment@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu Apr 12 2001 - 13:51:22 GMT-3
I do the same as below. One point I want to make is in a thread a few weeks
ago someone was trying to do NLSP over IPXWAN. I did not work (it didn't
work for me at home either). The reason seemed to be it was because they
put in "ipx routing 1.1.1" instead of letting the route using the default
one. When they changed it to just "ipx routing" NLSP over IPXWAN started
working. I haven't tried this yet.
-----Original Message-----
From: Earl Aboytes [mailto:Earl@dnssystems.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 11:08 AM
To: 'Daniel C. Young'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: ipx routing addressing scheme
Daniel,
Absolutely, do NOT, leave the IPX WAN addressing up to the router. Specify
the address by using the following formula:
R1
Ipx routing 1.1.1
R2
Ipx routing 2.2.2
And so forth.
I have done it both ways and you will waste a lot of time if you let the
router assign the number. Remember, when you ping an address you don't need
the whole address. You could type ping ipx aa.1.1.1 instead of
aa.0001.0001.0001. Either one will work, but what would you rather type?
Earl Aboytes, CCIE 6097
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel C. Young [mailto:danyoung99@mediaone.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 9:59 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: ipx routing addressing scheme
The command 'ipx routing'
Should I specify the address on this statement for ease of troubleshooing,
such as 'ipx routing 0000.0000.1111' for router1? Or, should I just leave it
to the whims of the router? For those who have attempted the lab, are you
required to do it a specific way?
Thanks,
Daniel Young
Sr. Network Engineer
Internet Data Center
SBC Service Inc. - ITO
(949) 221-1928 Office
(714) 350-8945 Cell
ICQ# 109846891
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:44 GMT-3