Re: DLSW+

From: YJC (stiff.yu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Apr 12 2001 - 06:29:50 GMT-3

• Next message: xander: "Re: Can Someone explain the "Feedback Routes scenario""
• Previous message: Jason1: "Re: You have won! 1"
• Maybe in reply to: Oscar Diaz Poveda: "DLSW+"
• Next in thread: xander: "Re[2]: DLSW+"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
i have try the 'dest-mac' parameter in the remote peer statement,
connection is always brought up whether frames destined for that mac
address are or not
why?

----- Original Message ----- the peer
>
From: Keith Leonard <Keith_Leonard@data3.com.au>
To: Oscar Diaz Poveda <Oscar.Diaz@azlan.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: DLSW+

> Oscar,
>
> When using the 'dest-mac' parameter in the remote peer statement, the
peer
> connection is only brought up when frames destined for that mac address
are
> detected, however, when using the 'dmac-output-list' option, the peer
> connection will be made automatically but all frames that don't comply
with
> the access list specified will be dropped.
>
> Regards,
> Keith

• Next message: xander: "Re: Can Someone explain the "Feedback Routes scenario""
• Previous message: Jason1: "Re: You have won! 1"
• Maybe in reply to: Oscar Diaz Poveda: "DLSW+"
• Next in thread: xander: "Re[2]: DLSW+"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:44 GMT-3