Re: ipx routing addressing scheme

From: xander (xander@xxxxxx)
Date: Thu Apr 12 2001 - 03:34:50 GMT-3

• Next message: xander: "Re[2]: What Frame interfaces can IS-IS be configured on?"
• Previous message: xander: "Re: "Sh ip Rou" Command question."
• Maybe in reply to: Daniel C. Young: "ipx routing addressing scheme"
• Next in thread: Dan: "Re: ipx routing addressing scheme"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Hello Daniel,

Each person chooses its own TS method for ipx.
As for me I alvays put something like 'ipx routing 1.1.1' - for R1 and
so on...

DCY> The command 'ipx routing'

DCY> Should I specify the address on this statement for ease of troubleshooing,
DCY> such as 'ipx routing 0000.0000.1111' for router1? Or, should I just leave
it
DCY> to the whims of the router? For those who have attempted the lab, are you
DCY> required to do it a specific way?

DCY> Thanks,

--
 WBW, xander
 mailto:xander@adt.ru
 CCNA, CCNP+VoiceAccess, CCIE very soon :-)
...

• Next message: xander: "Re[2]: What Frame interfaces can IS-IS be configured on?"
• Previous message: xander: "Re: "Sh ip Rou" Command question."
• Maybe in reply to: Daniel C. Young: "ipx routing addressing scheme"
• Next in thread: Dan: "Re: ipx routing addressing scheme"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:44 GMT-3