RE: New wait policy

From: Jeff Kesemeyer (jeffkesemeyer@xxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Apr 10 2001 - 14:06:16 GMT-3

• Next message: sanjay: "Re: Access-List question -permiting only based on last octet bein g a even number"
• Previous message: Scott Benton: "New wait policy"
• Maybe in reply to: Scott Benton: "New wait policy"
• Next in thread: Ramesh Ramasamy: "RE: New wait policy"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
I think this is a great idea for two reasons, it will help those who should
be able to get a sooner date and second by possibly letting you know how
well or how bad you did. If I only got 18 out of 45 points I don't want to
go back and throw away $1250 before I am ready,

        IMHO,

                Jeff Kesemeyer

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Scott Benton
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 12:27 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: New wait policy

I don't know if anyone's seen this yet, but it
definitely adds a new twist to the maze.

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html

I think we all saw this one coming.
Scott Benton, CCIE# 6881

• Next message: sanjay: "Re: Access-List question -permiting only based on last octet bein g a even number"
• Previous message: Scott Benton: "New wait policy"
• Maybe in reply to: Scott Benton: "New wait policy"
• Next in thread: Ramesh Ramasamy: "RE: New wait policy"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:43 GMT-3