RE: summary address prefix mask [not advertise]

From: Jeremy Gray (jeremy.gray@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Apr 08 2001 - 09:05:27 GMT-3

• Next message: Jerry Hutcheson: "TFTP errors"
• Previous message: Elias Aggelidis: "RE: Off Topic - Lab Report - Learning from Adversity"
• Maybe in reply to: Alejandro Cadarso: "summary address prefix mask [not advertise]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/nssa.html

A little while back Les Hardin pointed people at this great cco link when an
NSSA question came up.

Its a great read and answers this question and many others...

Regards, Jeremy.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Alejandro Cadarso
Sent: 07 April 2001 19:27
To: ccielab
Subject: summary address prefix mask [not advertise]

Hi,

Anybody have used the tag "not advertise " for the command summary address?

If I understand OK, and I have tried it is:

(Optional) Used to suppress routes that match the prefix/mask pair. This
keyword applies to OSPF only.

I can't imagine the use of this tag, in wich scenario we need to define
a summary if we are not going to propagate it?

Thanks

• Next message: Jerry Hutcheson: "TFTP errors"
• Previous message: Elias Aggelidis: "RE: Off Topic - Lab Report - Learning from Adversity"
• Maybe in reply to: Alejandro Cadarso: "summary address prefix mask [not advertise]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:42 GMT-3