From: Guido Viarengo (guidoviarengo@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Apr 06 2001 - 06:07:01 GMT-3
Hi, You should : redistribute mobile subnets >From: "Haohong Lin"
>Reply-To: "Haohong Lin" >To: "CCIELab" , "Michael E. Flannagan"
>Subject: RE: Mobile IP vs. LAM >Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 10:54:23 +0800 >
>Thank you for showing me the alternative direction. > > I have read the
white paper and practised in my lab. I move my >laptop(10.1.1.195) to
another subnet and change default-gateway >(192.168.1.250). I telnet to
R2 sucessfully. In R2 routing table, > there is an entry of 10.1.1.195
with M code. It seems fine, hmm. >Then I found my problem -- I can't ping
my laptop through R2, >although I have telneted to it. There is an entry
of my laptop's >MAC address, when I "show arp" on R2. In R1's routing
table, >there is not a host route of 10.1.1.195(My laptop's IP address).
> > Can you tell me what 's the matter? > >Topo & conf as follows: >
|10.1.1.250/16 > |-------R1--------/ | > | -----------R2----- |
>192.168.1.250/24 > >| > > R1: >int e0 > ip add 10.1.1.250 255.255.0.0 >
ip mobile arp >int s0 > ip add 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 > >router mobile
> >router ospf 10 > net 10.1.1.250 0.0.0.0 are 0 > net 192.168.2.1
0.0.0.0 are 0 > redist mobile > default-metric 10 > >R2: > int e0 > ip
add 192.168.1.250 255.255.255.0 > >int s0 > ip add 192.168.2.2
255.255.255.0 > >router ospf 10 > net 192.168.1.250 0.0.0.0 are 0 > net
192.168.2.2 0.0.0.0 are 0 > >Regards, > > Haohong Lin >-----Original
Message----- >From: nobody@groupstudy.com
[mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of >Michael E. Flannagan >Sent:
Friday, April 06, 2001 3:14 AM >To: Hebert, Cory J
(cory.hebert@wcom.com); ccielab@groupstudy.com >Subject: RE: Mobile IP
vs. LAM > >
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/partner/synchronicd/cc/pd/iosw/ioft/lam/tech/la
>mso_wp.htm > >Search for "Mobile IP" - it does a reasonable job
explaining the >difference. > >
>--------------------------------------------------------- > C i s c o S
y s t e m s Michael E. Flannagan > | | Network Consulting Engineer > |||
||| Research Triangle Park, NC > ||||||| ||||||| (919) 392-4550
>.:|||||||||||:.:|||||||||||:. mflannag@cisco.com
>--------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > >
-----Original Message----- > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
[mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of > > Hebert, Cory J
(cory.hebert@wcom.com) > > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 2:51 PM > > To:
'ccielab@groupstudy.com' > > Subject: Mobile IP vs. LAM > > > > > >
Here's one I posted about a week ago, but didn't get any > > feedback, so
here's > > another try: > > > > How do you know when you're supposed to
use Mobile IP or > > Local-area mobility > > (LAM)? > > > > Thanks, > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:41 GMT-3