From: Rob Webber (rwebber@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 04 2001 - 14:12:42 GMT-3
You probably don't have a Frame Relay map on R2 for R3 and vice versa. So on
R2 you would need:
serial 0
frame-relay map ipx 100.0003.0003.0003 105 broadcast
where 100.0003.0003.0003 is the IPX address of the Frame-relay interface on
R3 and 105 is the DLCI on R2. Note - you can find the IPX address on R3 by
entering "show ipx int." However you can also make it easy (as above) by
entering the global command on R3:
ipx routing 3.3.3
Rob.
P.S. If you place a map on R2 for R3, its also a good idea to place a map
for R1 on R2 as well (and the same for R3). Depending on the IOS, you might
otherwise lose connectivity to R1 after a reboot.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mick Vollmer [mailto:mvollmer@visi.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 12:12 PM
To: rwebber@callisma.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: IPX and RIP
OK - I followed your advice and I'm seeing IPX routes on R2 from R3 and R3
from R2. I can ping from R1 to R2 or R3, R2 and R3 to R1 but not from R2 to
R3 or R3 to R2. The routes are there, the pings get to R3 but I'm getting
the following error on R3:
03:30:14: IPX: local:300.0003.0003.0003->2.0002.0002.0002 ln=100 tc=00 pt=02
ds=
0002 ss=0002, encap failed
03:30:14: IPXECHO: Can't send echo
R1 S0/0.1
| |
| |
| |
| |
R2 R3
S0 S0
Any ideas?
Mick
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Webber" <rwebber@callisma.com>
To: "'Mick Vollmer'" <mvollmer@visi.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 10:18 AM
Subject: RE: IPX and RIP
> Short of static routes (really ugly), I would recommend enabling EIGRP
just
> on the frame links (and disabling RIP). Mutual redistribution with EIGRP
and
> RIP is automatic, so you don't have to mess around with any of that stuff.
>
> You could also do EIGRP on the LAN side, but if you have any nodes (Novell
> servers, etc.) they usually need RIP, so its just as easy to use RIP
there.
>
> If I was given a lab scenario that simply instructed "enable IPX on all
> interfaces..." and some of them happened to be FR, I would immediately
jump
> to EIGRP on the FR. Tunnels might be another (messier) option...
>
> Rob.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Mick Vollmer
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 9:38 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: IPX and RIP
>
>
> I have a question regarding IPX RIP. I understand the split horizon issue
> and have read that you can't disable split horizon on RIP. I'm working on
a
> hub and spoke frame config that is not fully meshed and I had to disable
> inverse ARP. What alternatives do I have for addressing the split horizon
> issue? Do I have to replace the IGP with EIGRP or just do that over the
> frame links? Any ideas would be appreciated.
>
> Mick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:40 GMT-3