From: Rob Webber (rwebber@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 04 2001 - 11:18:52 GMT-3
Short of static routes (really ugly), I would recommend enabling EIGRP just
on the frame links (and disabling RIP). Mutual redistribution with EIGRP and
RIP is automatic, so you don't have to mess around with any of that stuff.
You could also do EIGRP on the LAN side, but if you have any nodes (Novell
servers, etc.) they usually need RIP, so its just as easy to use RIP there.
If I was given a lab scenario that simply instructed "enable IPX on all
interfaces..." and some of them happened to be FR, I would immediately jump
to EIGRP on the FR. Tunnels might be another (messier) option...
Rob.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Mick Vollmer
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 9:38 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: IPX and RIP
I have a question regarding IPX RIP. I understand the split horizon issue
and have read that you can't disable split horizon on RIP. I'm working on a
hub and spoke frame config that is not fully meshed and I had to disable
inverse ARP. What alternatives do I have for addressing the split horizon
issue? Do I have to replace the IGP with EIGRP or just do that over the
frame links? Any ideas would be appreciated.
Mick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:40 GMT-3