From: Curtis Call (curtiscall@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 04 2001 - 10:56:47 GMT-3
No, you would give both sides a /32 address i.e. one side 10.0.0.1 and one
side 10.0.0.2, and you would additionally configure them with their
destination address. I don't know the particulars, again I believe this is
a new idea, but I don't believe they would necessarily need to be
consecutive (but again I could be wrong). I realize that in some cases
this wouldn't be the best idea, but this is a lab setting and also given
that this is the lab mailing list I don't think the usual question should
be "Why would I do this?" or "What is the best way to do this?" but given
the strange things we are tested on I think the proper question most times
is "This might seem kindof crazy, but how do I do this?"
At 02:35 AM 4/4/01, you wrote:
>So you would give both sides of the link the same address and the link would
>just look like one physical interface?
>
>Tim
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Curtis Call" <curtiscall@home.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 10:24 PM
>Subject: Cisco support for /32 p-to-p links
>
>
>Anyone know if Cisco supports /32 point to point links and if so the
>commands necessary to do it? I work with Junipers at my job, which do
>support this, and I'd like to connect the two via SONET with only a /32
>used but I'm having trouble figuring out how to do it on the Cisco side. I
>think this is somewhat of a new development so they might not support it
>yet, but I thought I'd ask.
>
>Thanks.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:40 GMT-3