From: Les Hardin (hardinl@xxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 04 2001 - 10:02:21 GMT-3
You forgot the easiest way. Type fast!
At 09:27 PM 4/3/2001 -0400, Ron wrote:
>Hi, all cool guys,
>
>Thanks a lot for your answers. Based on your suggestions, there are three
>ways to do it:
>
>1. copy and paste
>
>- change terminal setting (ctrl function as "windows", otherwise, ctrl+v
>doesn't work, also, don't forget to change it back, you need to use ctrl
>function as "terminal")
>- create script:
> conf t
> line 0
> exec-t 0 0
> ..........
>- hit ctrl+v
>
>2. hit tab or space or arrow, then type fast for the commands, it can be
>done (quickest way), I got used to it within 10 min.
>
>3. the same procedure as the password recovery (the slowest)
>
>Thanks again,
>
>Ron
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Stephen Austin" <routepackets@earthlink.net>
>To: "'Andy Jackson'" <Andy.Jackson@snsl.co.uk>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>;
><ron@xtranetsolutions.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:06 PM
>Subject: RE: how to recover if exec-timeout 0 1
>
>
> > or, use the right arrow key.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > Andy Jackson
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 3:22 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; ron@xtranetsolutions.com
> > Subject: Re: how to recover if exec-timeout 0 1
> >
> >
> > Ron,
> >
> > The method I use is to log into the router, enter config mode and change
>the
> > exec-timeout whilst at the same time continually hitting the <TAB> key.
>As
> > long as the router sees at least one keystroke per second it will not log
> > you out.
> >
> > It may take a couple of practice goes but it does work...
> >
> >
> > aj...
> >
> > >>> "Ron Z." <ron@xtranetsolutions.com> 04/03/01 05:17am >>>
> > Hi, Guys,
> >
> > This question may be too simple for you, but I don't know. I'm playing
>with
> > troubleshooting. If the "exec-timeout 0 1" is set up on "line 0", "line
>vty
> > 0 4", "line aux 0", it is impossible for me do disable "exec-timeout 0 1"
> > within one second. I think about using the same procedures for password
> > recovery. But there may be some other short-cut to do it. Is there anybody
> > know this trick?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > Ron
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Shawn Bowen <shawn@bowen.com>
> > To: 'tom cheung' <tkc9789@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 10:37 PM
> > Subject: RE: Proxy ARP
> >
> >
> > > According to Cisco IDRP uses Router-Advertisement and
>Router-Solicitation
> > > messages to discover the addresses of routers on directly attached
> > subnets.
> > > Each router periodically multicasts Router-Advertisement messages from
> > each
> > > of its interfaces. Hosts then discover addresses of routers on directly
> > > attached subnets by listening for these messages. Hosts can use
> > > Router-Solicitation messages to request immediate advertisements rather
> > than
> > > waiting for unsolicited messages.
> > > IRDP offers several advantages over other methods of discovering
>addresses
> > > of neighboring routers. Primarily, it does not require hosts to
>recognize
> > > routing protocols, nor does it require manual configuration by an
> > > administrator.
> > > Router-Advertisement messages enable hosts to discover the existence of
> > > neighboring routers, but not which router is best to reach a particular
> > > destination. If a host uses a poor first-hop router to reach a
>particular
> > > destination, it receives a Redirect message identifying a better choice.
> > > Shawn
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: tom cheung [mailto:tkc9789@hotmail.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 7:46 PM
> > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: RE: Proxy ARP
> > >
> > > What about IRDP? How would one set up a Windows client without a default
> > > gateway and take advantage of IRDP?
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: "Pickell, Aaryn" <Aaryn.Pickell@getronics.com>
> > > >Reply-To: "Pickell, Aaryn" <Aaryn.Pickell@getronics.com>
> > > >To: "'Bowen, Shawn'" <sbowen@neteffectcorp.com>, Tariq Sharif
> > > ><tariq_sharif@btinternet.com>, "Ccielab@Groupstudy. Com"
> > > ><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > >Subject: RE: Proxy ARP
> > > >Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 19:23:05 -0400
> > > >
> > > >Proxy arp is also useful when you have your subnet masks misconfigured.
> > > >Say, for example, the router has two /24 segments attached. If there
>is
> > a
> > > >host configured with a /23 instead, it will try arping for addresses
> > which
> > > >are not actually directly connected. The router will respond with its
> > own
> > > >MAC and then forward the traffic.
> > > >
> > > >They use this in access servers as well. Assume a large modem bank on
>an
> > > >AS5300, with a bunch of users dialing in. Each of these users is given
> > an
> > > >address from the segment that's attached to the ethernet segment. When
> > > >hosts actually on that ethernet wish to talk to the dial-in users, they
> > > >believe them to be directly connected, so they arp. The AS5300 will
> > > >respond
> > > >with its own MAC and forward the packets correctly.
> > > >
> > > >Aaryn Pickell - CCNP, CCDP, MCSE
> > > >Senior Engineer - Routing Protocols
> > > >Getronics Inc.
> > > >Direct: 713-394-1609
> > > >Email:aaryn.pickell@getronics.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Bowen, Shawn [mailto:sbowen@neteffectcorp.com]
> > > > > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 5:50 PM
> > > > > To: Tariq Sharif; Ccielab@Groupstudy. Com
> > > > > Subject: RE: Proxy ARP
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > With Microsoft clients there is a way to "Set all segments as
> > > > > local" so to
> > > > > speak, I forget how off the top of my head but this will work
> > > > > as well. Now
> > > > > as to proxy ARP, the workstation, be it Unix or Microsoft looks at
>the
> > > > > destination IP and compares it's own IP and MASK to see if it
> > > > > is local, if
> > > > > it is then it will be encapsulated in an Ethernet (or whatever other
> > > > > topology you are using) frame and then put on the wire, if
> > > > > the destination
> > > > > network is on a different segment then your machine will not
> > > > > know what to do
> > > > > with it unless there is a default gateway setup (or you set
> > > > > "all subnets
> > > > > local"). This is why you are seeing this; it is perfectly
> > > > > normal in the
> > > > > Unix, Novell, and Windows world.
> > > > >
> > > > > As another example. With a Microsoft dial-up
> > > > > networking setup you
> > > > > set it to obtain it's address automatically, sometime do a
> > > > > "winipcfg" on
> > > > > 95/98 or an ipconfig /all in NT and check out your IP and
> > > > > Default gateway,
> > > > > they will normally be the same, this is because the ISP is
> > > > > doing proxy arp
> > > > > and the machine then knows to send ALL traffic to the
> > > > > interface as local
> > > > > traffic, the router will deal with the rest.
> > > > >
> > > > > Shawn
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Tariq Sharif [mailto:tariq_sharif@btinternet.com]
> > > > > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 6:31 PM
> > > > > To: Ccielab@Groupstudy. Com
> > > > > Subject: Proxy ARP
> > > > >
> > > > > In Doyle's TCP/IP book (page 69-70) & in other text there is
> > > > > about Proxy
> > > > > ARP. Says that hosts without any default gateway can be issue
> > > > > ARP & LAN
> > > > > router (knowing where the destination is) will issue PROXY
> > > > > ARP reply. So the
> > > > > local host (without default gateway) can reach remote hosts.
> > > > > I can't see
> > > > > this working with NT 4 or Win 95 unless I assign the PCs own
> > > > > address as its
> > > > > default gateway. My question is, do Unix clients behave the same as
> > > > > Microsoft clients? If so, what am I missing?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Many thanks & regards.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tariq Sharif
> > > > >
> > > > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type
> > > > > application/ms-tnef which had a
> > > > > name of winmail.dat]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:40 GMT-3