From: marcosp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue Apr 03 2001 - 08:30:40 GMT-3
>From Doyle:
"The passwords do not have to be the same througout the area, but must be the
same between neighbors. "
Which drives my question: If you have two neighbors with authetication , lets
say area 0, and a third router ,that is in area 1 for instance, want to make a
vir-link with one of them you don`t need to set password? Is that right?
Marcos
Stuart Mark wrote:
> I thought you could run authenticatication between adjancencies
> (neighbours?) without having to run it across a whole area?
>
> Check out Doyle in the OSPF authentication case study?
>
> Stuart
>
> For more information on Standard Life, visit our website
> http://www.standardlife.com/ The Standard Life Assurance Company, Standard
> Life House, 30 Lothian Road, Edinburgh EH1 2DH, is registered in Scotland
> (No SZ4) and regulated by the Personal Investment Authority. Tel: 0131 225
> 2552 - calls may be recorded or monitored. This confidential e-mail is for
> the addressee only. If received in error, do not retain/copy/disclose it
> without our consent and please return it to us. We virus scan all e-mails
> but are not responsible for any damage caused by a virus or alteration by a
> third party after it is sent.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ccienxtyear@hotmail.com <ccienxtyear@hotmail.com>
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Date: 02 April 2001 22:54
> Subject: MD5 -OSPF Authentication ??
>
> I am working on a lab where I have 3 routers accross a Frame Cloud. R1 is
> the
> hub and R2 & R3 are spokes. The lab says to configure R1 & R2 with OSPF MD5
> authentication and using password 'cisco". Then it says, make sure you can
> still see all the routes on R1, R2 & R3. Is this possible ?? I thought that
> MD5 authentication needs to be running on all 3 routers for them to get
> route
> updates from each other.?? Any comments
>
> thanks,
> Sanjay
> =
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:39 GMT-3