From: Chuck Larrieu (chuck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Apr 03 2001 - 04:08:09 GMT-3
One might presume that if one wants to "get routes" that routing is
involved. Pure bridging only links segments on the same network, and does
nothing to assist in discovering other networks.
Hhhmmm......
Now I'm wondering if one can bridge multiple networks over the same
interface using subinterfaces or secondary addresses......
Oh goody. Just the kind of thing I need to say publicly when my lab proctor
is out there just looking for things to put into my lab on Friday ;->
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Brian Postma
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 5:35 PM
To: ccielab
Cc: Haohong Lin; CCIE Lab
Subject: Re: an IPX question
Is there a reason to do IRB? Wouldn't regular bridging work just fine?
Keep
it simple if you can.
Brian Postma
ccielab wrote:
> hi,
> on R2 use IRB and bvi interface
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Haohong Lin <hhlin@szskzj.com>
> To: CCIE Lab <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 11:18 AM
> Subject: an IPX question
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > R1 ----------------------------------R2
> > e0 e0
> >
> > R1 has some ipx routes to advertise to R2. I don't set
ipx
> > network on R2's E0 interface, but I still want to get the ipx routes
from
> > router R1 on the other side. Can I do it?
> >
> > I don't want to use Tunnel.
> >
> > Haohong Lin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:39 GMT-3