From: Troy Edington (TEdington@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Mar 03 2001 - 14:11:09 GMT-3
I think I understand what you are saying. Not an answer to your exact
question, but an alternatice. The easiest way to build redundancy is build
a port channel between the two Catalysts, and trunk on top of that. If you
lose one of the ports in the channel, the other one will continue to
function and you then have port level redundancy. The only other way I
could think of is run spanning tree (ISL trunk) and set cat1 to be root for
VLAN 2, play with the port costs making your second trunk less favorable
then the first one for that VLAN. I never tried that, but thats where I
would look, could be wrong. Feel free to correct me anyone.
Cheers
Troy Edington
7 days left...
-----Original Message-----
From: David FAHED [mailto:dfahed@outremer.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 8:35 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Catalyst question - off topic
Hi,
How can I prevent to advertise a VLAN on trunk port?
My problem :
Catalyst 1-------------Trunk 1-----------------catalyst 2
--------------Trunk2------------------
I want to filter some VLAN on the trunk 1. For example I don't want VLAN2 go
on the trunk 1 but go with trunk2. If trunk2 go down I want that trunk1 let
pass VLAN2.
I think it is possible but I don't know how.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:19 GMT-3