From: frank wells (fwells12@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Feb 28 2001 - 13:14:24 GMT-3
Got it. Cheers Chuck.
>From: "Chuck Larrieu" <chuck@cl.cncdsl.com>
>Reply-To: "Chuck Larrieu" <chuck@cl.cncdsl.com>
>To: "Groupstudy" <fwells11@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: Bootcamp lab#6
>Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:35:24 -0800
>
>I missed the early parts of this thread, so I may be repeating.
>
>Experiments on a 12.1 router and an 11.2 router revealed
>
>Here are a couple of configs. Too tired to write a story tonight.
>
>ipx routing 0005.0005.0005
>!
>interface Loopback0
> no ip address
> ipx network 55E
>
>ipx sap 4 printer 55E.0055.0055.0055 555 2
>
>notice that the ipx node number is different than the router ipx node
>number.
>
>if you try to use the same node number, you get the error
>
>Router_5(config)#ipx sap 23 unknown 55e.5.5.5 555 2
>%Illegal IPX address - can't be local host
>Router_5(config)#
>
>
>From another router:
>
>ipx routing 0002.0002.0002
>!
>interface Loopback0
> no ip address
> ipx network 22B
>!
>interface Ethernet0
> ip address 137.20.20.1 255.255.255.0
> ipx network 2B
>
>Router_2(config)#ipx sap 45 special 2b.2.2.2 222 2
>Router_2(config)#ipx sap 46 special 22b.2.2.2 222 2
>%Illegal IPX address - can't be local host
>Router_2(config)#
>
>Notice that if the ethernet interface is the net number, the node number
>can
>be the router node number. but if the loopback net number is used, one
>can't
>use the router node number
>
>Last observation for the evening:
>
>Router_2(config)#ipx sap 55 distant 22b.0010.7b7e.ebd7 365 3
>Router_2(config)#
>
>Using the loopback net number and the ethernet node number - works fine and
>dandy
>
>Conclusion: the node number has to be different than the node number of the
>interface used for the net number.
>
>Make sense? Loopback interface node number is the router itself's node
>number. i.e. mac address.
>
>Chuck
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Groupstudy
>Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 11:59 PM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: Bootcamp lab#6
>
>I am using 11.3 enterprise.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Rogell, Dennis <Dennis_Rogell@milgo.com>
>To: 'Frank Wells' <fwells11@hotmail.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 9:55 AM
>Subject: RE: Bootcamp lab#6
>
>
> > Frank
> > I created an ipx network to a loopback interface and that network was
> > learned by the other routers. Then I created 2 saps
> > using that network number and it worked all the other routers saw the 2
> > saps. I never received the message you got, so
> > my question would be what code are you running I am using 12.1 but also
>got
> > it working with 12.0(3)
> >
> > Dennis Rogell
> > Email : dennis_rogell@milgocom
> > Phone: (954) 846-5128
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Frank Wells [SMTP:fwells11@hotmail.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 08:22
> > > To: cisco@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: RE: Bootcamp lab#6
> > >
> > > I tried that at. All I got from IOS was something to the effect: You
> > > cannot
> > > use a local interface for this operation'
> > >
> > > I guess what your trying to say is use a loopback on a different
>router
> > > from
> > > the one where you want the SAP's advertised form. This doesn't seem
>to
> > > make
> > > a whole lot of sense however. You might as well just use an interface
>off
> > >
> > > another IPX router in your network to do this. To use a loopback
> > > interface
> > > from another router it must have the IPX network advertised from it so
>the
> > >
> > > SAP-originating server can learn it.
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: "Rogell, Dennis" <Dennis_Rogell@milgo.com>
> > > >To: 'Groupstudy' <fwells11@hotmail.com>
> > > >Subject: RE: Bootcamp lab#6
> > > >Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:24:38 -0500
> > > >
> > > >What Kevin is saying and I have done this plenty of times with no
>problem
> > >
> > > >is
> > > >to configure a loopback address for ipx and use that network number
>when
> > > >creating saps. Before you create the saps make sure that network is
> > > learned
> > > >through the networks hope this helps.
> > > >
> > > >Dennis
> > > >
> > > >Dennis Rogell
> > > >Email : dennis_rogell@milgocom
> > > >Phone: (954) 846-5128
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Groupstudy [SMTP:fwells11@hotmail.com]
> > > > > Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 22:35
> > > > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > > Subject: Bootcamp lab#6
> > > > >
> > > > > I am mid-way through bootcamp lab 6. Task Three point 4 asks you
>to
>=
> > > > > create 2 SAP's. I tried creating one using local network node and
>=
> > > > > address but IOS does not like that. I then tried to create them
>using
> > > a
> > > >=
> > > > > network/node learned from IPX EIGRP. Still no joy. What's up
>with
>=
> > > > > that?
> > > > >
> > > > > I searched the archives and found this interesting comment from
>our
> > > very
> > > >=
> > > > > own Kevin Bumgardner that seems to imply you can create the SAP's
> > > using
> > > >=
> > > > > local N.H.H.H addresses etc:
> > > > >
> > > > > =20
> > > > > Q: How DO you get it to advertise the static SAPs out the serial
>=
> > > > > interface?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > A: No problem as long as you don't create a static sap that uses
>the
> > > > > ipx network that is defined on the serial interface and you want
> > > > > to send this sap over the serial interface. IPX SAP will not=20
> > > > > progate this sap update back out the serial interface. Basically =
> > > > > prevented=20
> > > > > by split-horizon.=20
> > > > >
> > > > > Create some loopback interfaces or use a ipx network that is
>known
> > > from
> > > > > another router by rip or eigrp. I have found that using loopback =
> > > > > interfaces
> > > > > with ipx networks and defining the static saps to these loopback =
> > > > > interfaces
> > > > > works the best.
> > > > >
> > > > > Kevin
> > > > >
> > > > > Can someone please clarify this issue for me please.
> > > > > =20
> > > > >
> > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:09 GMT-3