From: Frank Jimenez (franjime@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Feb 27 2001 - 22:27:10 GMT-3
Les,
You will almost always want to use subinterfaces to configure two IPX networks
on the same physical interfaces. Support for IPX secondary networks is being p
hased out for future releases of IOS....
Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738
franjime@cisco.com
At 04:49 PM 02/27/2001 +0000, Flack, Les wrote:
>
>
>Can anyone confirm whether an Ethernet configured with two IPX address's =
>(IPX RIP) on different encapsulations (ie a secondary address) behaves =
>as two interfaces or is there a split-horizon issue here?
>cciebootcamp 17 has a scenario where the solution shows the two IPX nets =
>on separate subints but I tried both ipx nets on the same physical and =
>it seems to work also.=20
>
>With different encapsulations on subints.
>r6(e0)------------(e0.1)R14(e0.2)--------------(e0)r4
> Novell-Ether ARPA
> 1406 1404
>or
>
>With different encapsulation on secondary address.
> r6 r14 r4
>(e0)-----------------(e0)---------------(e0)
> Novell-Ether ARPA
> 1406 1404
>=20
>Debug ipx routing acivity on r14 shows the same rip updates on either =
>approach.
>
>thanks in advance
>
>regards,
>
>Les
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:08 GMT-3