From: Murphy, Brennan (Brennan_Murphy@xxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Feb 27 2001 - 19:29:57 GMT-3
Also, obviously for the called router to become a calling
router it needs a dialer string. I missed that in my
previous note.
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnny Dedon [mailto:johnny.dedon@exodus.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 4:57 PM
To: Murphy, Brennan; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Caslow's Dialer Profiles Example pg 188-89 2nd edition
The answer is yes, you woudl mirror the headquarters config. The point here
is that the dialer remote-name statement can not be duplicated on the
calling router but other that that it is insignificant to the called
router. The called router will be looking for the hostname of the calling
router by default unless you specify with the chap hostname command. The
called router must have the dialer remote-name statement matching either the
hostname or the chap hostname of the calling router. Gets confusing.
The answer to your other question is "left over" or extraneous command base
on the limited clip
HTH
Johnny Dedon
Senior Staff Consultant
Exodus Professional Services
johnny.dedon@exodus.net
www.exodus.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Murphy, Brennan" <Brennan_Murphy@NAI.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 3:42 PM
Subject: Caslow's Dialer Profiles Example pg 188-89 2nd edition
> On pg 188-189 of Caslow's 2nd edition, he lays out a PPP CHAP config
> using Dialer Profiles. In his example, 1 router is the calling router and
> the other, the called router. My question: how would the config be
> modified so that both routers could call each other?
>
> Is the answer that the called router in the example would need a PPP chap
> hostname
> command and the calling router would need a dialer remote-name command
> ....along with the calling router's username database to reflect the new
> remote
> names? in other words, each side would need the other's config but with
> unique remote names?
>
> And if you're actually looking at Caslow's book to understand my question,
> flip over to pg 186 and in his sample config, why is that no ip classless
> statement in his sample at the top?
>
> Thanks for the help.
> -bm
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:08 GMT-3