From: Peter (peter@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Feb 25 2001 - 21:17:44 GMT-3
I could tell you all about the points I missed on my recent trips to the 48
hour brain melt session but that would violate the NDA that I and everyone
else signed when you take the lab. This is definite violation, so to keep
with up with the Joneses, I posted my missed points at:
http://www.web53.com/labs/answers.htm
If you already told me that this is not appropriate, I understand and
neither is posting NDA info!!!
Maybe one of the lab proctors could just post the labs, it would be so much
easier to study that way! Come on guys, I know you follow this list, please?
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Antonsen" <dantonse@cisco.com>
To: "Nigel Taylor" <nigel_taylor@hotmail.com>; "Andy Needham"
<andy.needham@tesco.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Cc: "Rob Warnke" <rwarnke@cisco.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 8:18 PM
Subject: RE: Frame Relay Inverse-Arp + Map Statement
> Intresting Nigel, I went for my exam in January and the proctor didn't
give
> me my frame-relay points because I didn't explicitly type "no frame-relay
> inverse-arp". When I told him that inverse-arp is disabled by default, he
> agreed, but he still saw dynamic maps when he did show frame relay map.
He
> couldn't explain it either. He wanted to see it explicitly turned off as
it
> still showed up with dynamic routes.
> =- Dave
>
> ----Cisco Systems---
> David Antonsen
> Systems Engineer
> Office (631) 391-2055
> Pager (800) 365-4578
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Nigel Taylor
> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 6:33 AM
> To: Andy Needham; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Frame Relay Inverse-Arp + Map Statement
>
>
> Andy,
> We recently had a pretty decent thread on this a couple of
weeks
> ago. A couple of the folks that attended "Mentortech's ECP1" class at the
> time returned and informed us of Bruce and Val's thoughts on this issue.
> Apparently as of 12.0, frame-relay inverse-arp is now longer disabled with
> the use of map commands.
> What is being was being said was in making use of the frame map command
the
> general rule is to disable it manually with the "no frame inverse-arp"
> command. However, In my preparation I plan on following the very specific
> requirements of the lab and what I've been practicing.
>
> What have most of you folks been doing...?
>
> HTH
>
> Nigel.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Andy Needham <andy.needham@tesco.net>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 5:59 AM
> Subject: Frame Relay Inverse-Arp + Map Statement
>
>
> >
> > I figured I knew Frame-Relay issues until today !!
> >
> > I have a scenario whereby I am running a Frame-Relay Switch with 4
> > Remote Spokes.
> >
> > R1 (s0) 172.1.4.1 ---------> (s0) FrameSwitch
> > R2 (s0) 172.1.4.2 ---------> (s3) FrameSwitch
> > R3 (s0) 172.1.4.3 ---------> (s1) FrameSwitch
> > R4 (s0) 172.1.4.4 ---------> (s2) FrameSwitch
> >
> > The Frame Network is partial mesh, no PVC's are configured between
> > R1 and R3, R2 and R3.
> >
> > FrameSwitch Config :
> >
> > interface Serial0
> > frame-relay route 112 interface Serial3 121
> > frame-relay route 114 interface Serial2 141
> > !
> > interface Serial1
> > frame-relay route 134 interface Serial2 143
> > !
> > interface Serial2
> > frame-relay route 141 interface Serial0 114
> > frame-relay route 142 interface Serial3 124
> > frame-relay route 143 interface Serial1 134
> > !
> > interface Serial3
> > frame-relay route 121 interface Serial0 112
> > frame-relay route 124 interface Serial2 142
> > !
> >
> > Physical Interfaces are being used at all 4 spokes and in order to
> > create
> > a full mesh I have configured Map statements at R1, R2 and R3.
> >
> > So great, everything works, all Networks available from all Routers. I
> > now
> > reload the Routers and expect my Network to run into problems.
> >
> > According to Caslow 2nd Edition, Page 118, "if the Router is reloaded,
> > Inverse-Arp
> > will be disabled for any DLCI that is used with a frame-relay map
> > Statement"
> >
> > The Routers reload, the network comes up, all networks are visible !!.
> > The Static
> > and Dynamic Maps are still valid.
> >
> > Is this an IOS level issue (I am running 12.0.8) or am I completely
> > missing the point ?.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Andy
> >
> > R1 S0 Config :
> > !
> > interface Serial0
> > ip address 172.1.4.1 255.255.254.0
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > no ip mroute-cache
> > no fair-queue
> > frame-relay map ip 172.1.4.3 114 broadcast
> > end
> >
> > R2 S0 Config :
> > !
> > interface Serial0
> > ip address 172.1.4.2 255.255.254.0
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > no ip mroute-cache
> > no fair-queue
> > frame-relay map ip 172.1.4.3 124 broadcast
> > end
> >
> > R3 S0 Config :
> > !
> > interface Serial0
> > ip address 172.1.4.3 255.255.254.0
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > no ip mroute-cache
> > no fair-queue
> > frame-relay map ip 172.1.4.1 134 broadcast
> > frame-relay map ip 172.1.4.2 134 broadcast
> > end
> >
> > R4 S0 Config :
> > !
> > interface Serial0
> > ip address 172.1.4.4 255.255.254.0
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > no ip split-horizon eigrp 1
> > no ip mroute-cache
> > no fair-queue
> > end
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:00 GMT-3