From: Peter Van Oene (pvo@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Feb 22 2001 - 16:03:41 GMT-3
In this case I searched the archives for the content that he requested and was
quite able to find numerous answers to this questions. It would be ideal if ev
eryone validated their questions or answers prior to posting, but thats not lik
ely to happen :)
I do agree that many topics return with 2000 answers that remain way off topic
do to infrequent subject line changes and frequent deep quoting.
Pete
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 2/22/2001 at 10:28 AM John Kaberna wrote:
>Yeah but have you ever tried to search the archives to find what you want?
>Sometimes certain topics have so many emails that its just quicker to email
>the group. Especially when its something like a home lab and there's
>problem about 1000 emails to read through. But, I also completely agree
>that people just blindly send posts without doing any research at all.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Peter Van Oene <pvo@usermail.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 10:07 AM
>Subject: Re: THROW THAT GUY OUT OF THIS GROUP
>
>
>> This is a little ridiculous. Although I don't agree with Jason's thoughts
>on how high or low the hiring bar is at large organizations, I can empathize
>with his frustration with certain posts that seem to indicate a lack of
>effort on the part of the poster. Umar has been looking for labs/gear for
>about a month now and seemingly has not checked cisco's site nor the
>groupstudy archives which contain numerous answers to his questions. I
>don't mind his asking it, but it doesn't surprise me that it found some
>warmer responses.
>>
>> If a bar was set for group membership, I would expect it to lie somewhat
>above all caps threats and right around often asked and answered questions.
>>
>> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>>
>> On 2/22/2001 at 5:39 PM Umar Abanifi wrote:
>>
>> >HI GUYS,
>> >THANKS A MILLION FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO DID NOT THINK ITS A STUPID QUESTION
>> >AND REPLIED.
>> >SORRY GUYS BUT THAT GUY HAS GOT AN EGO PROBLEM AND HERE IS MY REPLY TO
>HIS
>> >SENSELESS COMMENT.
>> >MR KNOW IT ALL, WHAT ARE YOU BLOODY DOING IN THIS GROUP, IF YOU HAVE SUCH
>A
>> >VAST KNOWLEDGE. JUST A SMALL CHALLENGE FOR YOU TRY GETTING INTO LUCENT OR
>> >ANY OF THESE BIG ORGANISATIONS. THE ONLY REASON WHY YOU CAN NOT GET IN IS
>> >BECAUSE YOU ARE FULL OF YOURSELF WITH A VERY SMALL BRAIN.
>> >NO NEED TO TELL YOU OF MY ACADEMIC QUALIFICATION AND NETWORKING EXPOSURE.
>> >BECAUSE YOU KNOW CISCO DOES NOT MEAN YOU ARE THE KING OF NETWORKING. YOU
>> >DON'T NEED TO REPLY IF YOU THINK IS A STUPID QUESTION.
>> >I WILL BLOW YOU AWAY WITH KNOWLEDGE AND I DO NOT BOOST OR BELITTLE OTHER
>> >BECAUSE THEY DON'T KNOW. THEREFORE WATCH WHAT YOU SAY
>> >Cheers
>> >
>> >Umar Abanifi
>> >Lucent Technologies Netcare
>> >Malvern House
>> >Bell Street
>> >Maidenhead
>> >Berkshire SL6 1BR
>> >Tel +44(0)1628 503000
>> >Fax +44(0)1628 503001
>> >Mobile 07799658022
>> >Email:umar_abanifi@ins.com
>> > Abanif-u@lucent.com
>> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:57 GMT-3