From: Hu, Wayne (WHu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Feb 22 2001 - 11:22:40 GMT-3
Percentage option is only supported on specific modules and affects the
whole module.
Try to show port broadcast after you set one port broadcast using
percentage, you will see that percentage will apply to all ports on the same
module.
So set packets per second for the specific port is more accurate.
-----Original Message-----
From: LabStudy [mailto:labstudy@etang.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 11:47 PM
To: Peter Puczko; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Bootcamp lab 18: Broadcast Supression
under ospf protocol,cost=100000000/bw,in doyle book,56k line cost is 1785,so
bw is 56000,it isn't 56*1024.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Puczko" <ppuczko@excite.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 12:43 AM
Subject: RE: Bootcamp lab 18: Broadcast Supression
> 3MB is actually 3,145,728 bytes not 3,072,000
> I didn't wake up completely. Sorry.
>
> Peter
>
>
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:30:37 -0500, Foster, Kristopher wrote:
>
> > I believe in the telcom world a megabit is 1,000,000 bits
> >
> > Kris,
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hardin Les - SMTP [mailto:hardinl@bah.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 11:00 AM
> > To: Derek Buelna; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: Bootcamp lab 18: Broadcast Supression
> >
> >
> >
> > FYI.
> >
> > Actually, 3Mbps = 3,072,000 bits per sec.
> >
> > Les
> >
> > At 02:37 AM 2/15/2001 -0800, Derek Buelna wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >I was thinking that if I was asked to configure this I'd probably do
it
> > >one way but they would have wanted it the other way.
> > >
> > >In lab 18 I believe it says to limit broadcasts on a port, on the
> > >catalyst, to 3Mb/s.
> > >
> > >Ok, so I read that the percentage of bandwidth method is more accurate
> > >and also hardware based but the answer uses the per packet method.
> > >
> > >I'm taking it that 3,000,000 bits/s / 8 = 375,000 bytes/s. I'm
> > >assuming that an average packet size of 1024 would make for an average
> > >throughput of 366.21 of these kinds of packets/s.
> > >
> > >Am I understanding this correctly?
> > >
> > >Wouldn't it be easier to just say 30%, since it's a 10,000,000 bits/s
> > >link?
> > >
> > >set port broadcast 2/9 367
> > >set port broadcast 2/9 30%
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >
> > >-Derek
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:57 GMT-3