From: Andrew Short (ashort@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Feb 20 2001 - 16:36:28 GMT-3
That will keep it from forming neighbors and exchanging routes on that
interface, but he is asking how to keep that interface from being
advertised out the other interfaces.
I'd do a distribute-list out for that.
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Pablo Thoma wrote:
> try
>
> passive-interface
>
> for those that you wish not to be included.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Pablo
>
> "Hebert, Cory J (cory.hebert@wcom.com)" wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have simple question for you guys. I have a router running eigrp, and al
l
> > interfaces on the router have subnets of the same major classful network.
> > Well, obviously, I put the classful network statement under eigrp. Well, a
s
> > soon as eigrp sees that it has an interface belonging to the same classful
> > network defined under the eigrp process, it injects the connected route int
o
> > the process.
> >
> > I've tried 'no redistribute connected', 'distribute-list x out connected',
> > nothing works. Can someone help me to stop this connected route from being
> > injected into eigrp, so that the downstream router doesn't learn it?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Cory
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:54 GMT-3