Re: how do I stop connected routes from being injected?

From: Pablo Thoma (pthoma@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Feb 20 2001 - 14:50:40 GMT-3

• Next message: David Wolsefer: "FW: Real Dumb BGP question - 'cuz it don't work this way?"
• Previous message: rdevito: "Paul's email"
• Maybe in reply to: Hebert, Cory J (cory.hebert@xxxxxxxx): "how do I stop connected routes from being injected?"
• Next in thread: Rick Burts: "Re: how do I stop connected routes from being injected?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
try

passive-interface

for those that you wish not to be included.

Cheers,

Pablo

"Hebert, Cory J (cory.hebert@wcom.com)" wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have simple question for you guys. I have a router running eigrp, and all
> interfaces on the router have subnets of the same major classful network.
> Well, obviously, I put the classful network statement under eigrp. Well, as
> soon as eigrp sees that it has an interface belonging to the same classful
> network defined under the eigrp process, it injects the connected route into
> the process.
>
> I've tried 'no redistribute connected', 'distribute-list x out connected',
> nothing works. Can someone help me to stop this connected route from being
> injected into eigrp, so that the downstream router doesn't learn it?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Cory
>

• Next message: David Wolsefer: "FW: Real Dumb BGP question - 'cuz it don't work this way?"
• Previous message: rdevito: "Paul's email"
• Maybe in reply to: Hebert, Cory J (cory.hebert@xxxxxxxx): "how do I stop connected routes from being injected?"
• Next in thread: Rick Burts: "Re: how do I stop connected routes from being injected?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:54 GMT-3