From: Curtis Call (curtiscall@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Feb 15 2001 - 12:39:33 GMT-3
Why not just make them passive OSPF interfaces? It seems silly to
redistribute a router's own links.
At 07:36 AM 2/15/01 -0600, you wrote:
>I went through the archives and someone had asked a similar question a
>while back but didn't get an answer (but did mention the issue was in
>bootcamp lab17).
>
>Here is the issue. Is there a trick to redistributing connected
>(loopbacks) ISIS networks into OSPF if the loopback/networks are on the
>redistributing router. I can get all the ospf routes into the isis domain
>but the directly connected isis loopbacks don't seem to get into isis.
>Other isis routes (including isis loopbacks on other ISIS routers do
>redistribute into ospf).
>
>The loopbacks look something like this on the mutually redistribution router
>
>inter lo38
>ip address 38.38.38.1 255.255.255.0
>ip router isis
>
>int lo99
>ip addr 99.99.99.1 255.255.255.0
>ip router isis
>
>I am using route-maps with prefix-list to stop any route feedback.
>
>
>Thanks,
>Kyle
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:49 GMT-3