From: Erick B. (erickbe@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Feb 14 2001 - 02:05:44 GMT-3
I realize this is kind of off-topic, but I thought
maybe someone on this list might have done this, or
knows if PIM doesn't get along between Cisco & Bay.
I'm trying to do PIM-SM multicast routing between a
Cisco router w/12.1.6 and a Bay BCN w/14.00r1d9 code
(Bay only does Sparse mode). I'm doing it over
Ethernet and have a PIM neighbor relationship formed.
My problem is I'm not passing IGMP traffic between
routers for some reason. If I replace the Bay with a
Cisco it works fine w/same basic config settings.
I am using MCASTER on test PCs off each routers test
Ethernet interface and the routers see the IGMP
join/leaves of the group no problem but they don't see
each other. I have tried livecaster app as well.
Cisco is BSR, Interface DR, and RP. The BCN shows the
Cisco being BSR and having DR. The BCN has no RP
setting but has a C-RP setting. When I enable that the
BCN is reporting itself as the C-RP and Cisco is
showing it is the C-RP. Cisco has higher IP address. I
don't see a way to set RP or C-RP priority in IOS. I
have disabled the C-RP function and C-BSR function on
Bay and still get no traffic across w/PIM relationship
formed.
Cisco config portions:
multicast-routing
int e0
description Ethernet to Bay BCN
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip pim sparse-mode
int e1
description LAN where test PC is
ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip pim sparse-mode
ip pim rp-address 192.168.1.1
ip pim bsr-cand e0
ip pim rp-cand e0
On the BCN:
PIM&IGMP on Ethernet connecting to Cisco.
PIM&IGMP on ethernet interface going to my test PC
TIA, Erick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:48 GMT-3