From: D. J. Jones (meganac@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Feb 13 2001 - 00:58:34 GMT-3
I think your mask applies to a 24 bit subnet while your host is a full 32
bits.
Suggest you either use 'ip route 173.168.40.0 255.255.255.0 10.20.1.1' or
'ip route 173.168.40.1 255.255.255.255 10.20.1.1'.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Weber" <itweber@netzero.net>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 5:17 PM
Subject: ccbotocamp lab #2...
> I'm having a few problems: (1) R6 has to be configured so that the
> speed on s1 is reflected in the OSPF metric but without using the ip
> ospf cost command.I know that this is manipulated by changing the bw on
> s1 but how do you know how much to change it in order to reflect the
> OSPF metric correctly. (2)They want you to throw a static route on r2 so
> that you can ping e0 on r4 but when I enter
> ip route 173.168.40.1 255.255.255.0 10.20.1.1 it sends back an error
> message
> %Inconsistent address and mask, on top of that I can't ping r3 but to me
> logically that shouldn't be a problem because they are in different AS's
> and r2 is running point-to-point with the hub and r3 is running
> multipoint so r1 dooesn't know that it has to map the dlci for it
> because it isn't listed under the multipoint int.
> Can anyone please give me a hand with these.
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:46 GMT-3