From: David Ankers (d.ankers@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Feb 12 2001 - 23:01:35 GMT-3
I'm still trying to figure out where my wife got 100lbs of apples from, in
fact as I'm not married, where did I got a wife from. Furthermore if she
wanted to take them to a farmer market, she can carry the lot herself as 1,
It was her idea in the first place and 2, I've got to study so I don't have
time to be carrying apples around, maybe if I pass the lab I can get a job
with more money so we can give up the fruit selling business.
On Monday 12 February 2001 22:27, Dan wrote:
> Although some might argue that it is redundant (sometimes redundancy is
> good
>
> :-)) I always like to specify equal or unequal so as not to create
>
> confusion.
>
> Dan Pontrelli
> Customer Installation Engineer - Verio NYC
> CCNP, MCSE, CNA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael E. Flannagan" <mflannag@cisco.com>
> To: "Chuck Larrieu" <chuck@cl.cncdsl.com>
> Cc: "Yurchenko, Michael" <michael.yurchenko@verizon.com>; "'Tariq Sharif'"
> <tariq_sharif@btinternet.com>; "Ccielab@Groupstudy. Com"
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 3:53 PM
> Subject: RE: To Load Share or to Load Balance?
>
> > EIGRP, using variance, over a 56k and a T1 would be (in my mind) load
> > sharing. Over two T1s would be load balancing.
> >
> > Just my $.02
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > C i s c o S y s t e m s Michael E. Flannagan
> >
> > | | Network Consulting Engineer
> > | |
> > ||| ||| Research Triangle Park, NC
> > ||| |||
> > ||||||| ||||||| (919) 392-4550
> >
> > .:|||||||||||:.:|||||||||||:. mflannag@cisco.com
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Chuck Larrieu wrote:
> > > Ah ah Mike, you don't escape so easily.... ;->
> > >
> > > Are you using the approach that load sharing = sending packets out a
>
> number
>
> > > of interfaces, or a number of routers ( "paths" ) in any ratio, as
>
> opposed
>
> > > to "load balancing" = sending an equal number of packets out each
>
> available
>
> > > path / interface / router?
> > >
> > > Or visa versa?
> > >
> > > If I have 100 lbs. of apples to carry to the local farmer's market, and
>
> I
>
> > > give 10 lbs. to my wife to carry, is that load balancing or load
>
> sharing?
>
> > > In general, my experience is that these terms are used interchangeably
>
> by a
>
> > > lot of folks. One must delve a bit deeper to determine what the real
> > > question is and what the real problem to be solved is, as opposed to
> > > the speaker's perception of these things.
> > >
> > > Chuck
> > > Words I dread hearing from a customer: I want to dual home with two
>
> ISP's,
>
> > > and load balance across the internet"
> > > Shoot me now and put me out of my misery.
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > > Yurchenko, Michael
> > > Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 11:59 AM
> > > To: 'Tariq Sharif'; Ccielab@Groupstudy. Com
> > > Subject: RE: To Load Share or to Load Balance?
> > >
> > > Load balancing is a subset of load sharing, where the shares of the
> > > load
>
> are
>
> > > equal.
> > >
> > > Michael Yurchenko
> > > CCIE# 6695, CCDP, CCNP ATM Specialist, MCSE
> > > Customer Support Engineer - 2
> > > michael.yurchenko@verizon.com
> > > 610-407-2154
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tariq Sharif [mailto:tariq_sharif@btinternet.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 2:00 PM
> > > To: Ccielab@Groupstudy. Com
> > > Subject: To Load Share or to Load Balance?
> > >
> > >
> > > Anyone enlighten me with the differences between these pls?
> > >
> > > any reference material will be appreciated.
> > >
> > > Many thanks & regards.
> > >
> > > Tariq Sharif
> > >
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:46 GMT-3