From: Les Hardin (hardinl@xxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Feb 12 2001 - 14:36:05 GMT-3
Where are you scheduled?
Les
At 09:27 AM 2/12/2001 -0800, pkm@calweb.com wrote:
>I am scheduled for March 28-29. I am looking to delay my lab. for two weeks.
>Any takers? Call me at 916 813-9400. Thanks.
>
>Phillip
>
>Nodir Nazarov wrote:
>
> > Hello, The Group,
> >
> > 2 routers:
> >
> > RtrA-------RtrB---Wks
> >
> > RtrA is connected to RtrB via T1, ip unnumbered.
> >
> > Ping from Wks (unix box) to RtrA gives the following:
> >
> > 64 bytes from x.x.x.x: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=1066.98 ms
> > 64 bytes from x.x.x.x: icmp_seq=1 ttl=241 time=68.157 ms
> > 64 bytes from x.x.x.x: icmp_seq=2 ttl=241 time=1088.62 ms
> > 64 bytes from x.x.x.x: icmp_seq=3 ttl=241 time=89.127 ms
> > 64 bytes from x.x.x.x: icmp_seq=4 ttl=241 time=1101.23 ms
> > 64 bytes from x.x.x.x: icmp_seq=5 ttl=241 time=102.235 ms
> >
> > As you see - every other responce takes long time but no packets are lost.
> > Ping from Wks to RtrB gives normal responce.
> >
> > Both serial lines are clean. Cleared counters and watched - nothing
> > happened . "debug ip packet" on both routers shows packets are leaving the
> > right interface. Fast 0/0 is always up/up.
> >
> > Question: for "unnumbered" serials is it enough to have fast ethernet to
> > be up/up, or it has to be clean (without input errors, for instance) ?
> >
> > Nodir
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:46 GMT-3