From: Dan (dp595@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Feb 12 2001 - 02:33:54 GMT-3
Well, if you have created a subinterface for each PVC, then you could use a
"distribute-list out" specifying the sub-interface that represents that PVC.
What you want to filter outgoing for that particular PVC/subinterface all
depends on the access-list you create of course.
Dan Pontrelli
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kurt E. Radecki" <kradecki@cisco.com>
To: "Dan" <dp595@optonline.net>; "CCIEList" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 8:43 PM
Subject: RE: router filtering
> Dan,
>
> That would deny all updates out of that interface. I only want to deny
> certain updates to certain remotes. In a situation where the hub is a
> physical or a point-to-multipoint subinterface, the subnet is the same for
> routers.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -Kurt
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Dan
> Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 6:37 PM
> To: Kurt E. Radecki; CCIEList
> Subject: Re: router filtering
>
>
> Kurt,
>
> Did you figure this out?
> If you want to filter the RIP update on a physical or subinterface it
> shouldn't be too difficult.
>
> Put this on the hub router
> router rip
> distribute-list 1 out (frame-relay interface)
>
> access-list 1 deny x.x.x.x (frame-relay net you want to filter from being
> advertised out).
> access-list 1 permit any
>
> Dan Pontrelli
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kurt E. Radecki" <kradecki@cisco.com>
> To: "CCIEList" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 8:48 PM
> Subject: router filtering
>
>
> > How does one filter routes based on a PVC? If I'm running RIP over Frame
> > Relay, and my hub interface is either a physical or point-to-multipoint
> > subinterface, I want split-horizon disabled so that routing updates will
> > pass to all remotes. But, with that, I don't want to advertise out the
PVC
> > from which a routing update came. Distribute-lists don't seem to give
the
> > granularity needed.
> >
> > Thoughts? Thanks.
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:45 GMT-3