From: Devender Singh (devender.singh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Feb 12 2001 - 01:10:50 GMT-3
I did turn off the synchronisation. also next hop is reachable. After all
the discussion I guess I have bad choice IOS's
this one is 2500-jos56-12.0(15).
Devender Singh
BE(Hons), CCNP
IP Solution Specialist
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Le [mailto:mmle@sprintparanet.com]
Sent: Sunday, 11 February 2001 4:18
To: 'Devender Singh'; 'Ccielab@Groupstudy. Com (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: BGP LOCAL PREF: Explain me this.
There are two reasons I can think of off hand.
Since the IBGP route is the one constantly being overlooked, see if you have
syncrhonization turned on. If you do and the the path isn't in IGP, then
it's not a valid path for selection.
Also, is the next-hop ip reachable? If it's not, then it also isn't a valid
path for selection.
Michael Le, CCIE #6811
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Devender Singh
Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 6:48 AM
To: Ccielab@Groupstudy. Com (E-mail)
Subject: BGP LOCAL PREF: Explain me this.
I always thought local pref is number two high in bgp decision process after
weight.
I am getting best path with local-pref of 50 instead of 200. It does not
make much sense to me. Do you guys agree with me.
r3#sh ip bgp
BGP table version is 33, local router ID is 172.17.33.3
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
internal
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 0.0.0.0 172.17.34.4 50 0 200 i
* i1.1.1.0/24 172.16.11.1 200 0 300 400 i
*> 172.17.34.4 50 0 200 400 i
* i2.1.1.0/24 172.16.11.1 200 0 300 400 i
*> 172.17.34.4 50 0 200 400 i
* i3.0.0.0 172.16.11.1 200 0 300 400 i
*> 172.17.34.4 50 0 200 400 i
* i192.168.16.0 172.16.11.1 0 200 0 300 ?
*> 172.17.34.4 50 0 200 400 300
?
* i192.168.17.0 172.16.11.1 0 200 0 300 ?
*> 172.17.34.4 50 0 200 400 300
?
* i192.168.18.0 172.16.11.1 0 200 0 300 ?
*> 172.17.34.4 50 0 200 400 300
?
* i192.168.19.0/28 172.16.11.1 0 200 0 300 ?
*> 172.17.34.4 50 0 200 400
300 ?
* i192.168.19.16/28 172.16.11.1 0 200 0 300 ?
*> 172.17.34.4 50 0 200 400
300 ?
* i192.168.19.32/28 172.16.11.1 0 200 0 300 ?
*> 172.17.34.4 50 0 200 400
300 ?
* i192.168.19.48/28 172.16.11.1 0 200 0 300 ?
*> 172.17.34.4 50 0 200 400
300 ?
* i200.1.3.0 172.16.11.1 200 0 300 400 200 ?
*> 172.17.34.4 0 50 0 200 ?
* i201.0.1.0 172.16.11.1 200 0 300 400 200 ?
*> 172.17.34.4 0 50 0 200 ?
* i201.1.1.0 172.16.11.1 200 0 300 400 200
?
*> 172.17.34.4 0 50 0 200 ?
* i201.1.2.0 172.16.11.1 200 0 300 400 200
?
*> 172.17.34.4 0 50 0 200 ?
* i201.2.1.0 172.16.11.1 200 0 300 400 200
?
*> 172.17.34.4 0 50 0 200 ?
r3#
Devender Singh
BE(Hons), CCNP
IP Solution Specialist
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:45 GMT-3