From: Mark Stover (mstover@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Feb 11 2001 - 00:05:47 GMT-3
Did you enable policy routing? There are two places that you have to "turn
it on" You need to identify which traffic flows should have policy routing
applied to them.
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Steven Weber
Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 9:30 PM
To: bruce@williamsnetworking.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: ccbootcamp lab#1...
what about the poll interval and hello interval commands? I don't know why,
but
I still cant get this thing to work. When I do a sh route-map I get 0
matches.
access-list 100 permit ip any host 10.10.1.5
access-list 100 permit ip any host 10.10.1.2
route-map FRAM permit 10
match ip address 100
set ip next-hop 10.10.1.1
I can't seem to figure it out.
Thanks for the help,
Steve
Bruce Williams wrote:
> The frame-relay map statements that they use are only from each individual
> spoke to the hub. That establishes spoke to hub connectivity, but not
spoke
> to spoke connectivity. You have to use a route-map for that instead of a
> frame-relay map statement.
>
> You could also have use inverse-arp for the hub to spoke connectivity
> instead of the map statement, but I assume they want you to become
familiar
> with map statements.
> I also assume that the LMI type of ansi is just to use something other
than
> the default for the sake of practice.
>
> Bruce Williams
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Weber [mailto:itweber@netzero.net]
> Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 8:41 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: ccbootcamp lab#1...
>
> I was looking through the answers to lab#1 and I noticed a few things:
> (1) the spoke routers have frame-relay map statements on them. Isn't the
> point not to have frame relay map statements on the spoke routers. (2)
> that they used the poll-interval and hello interval commands. Are those
> commands necessary in order to get the lab to work, if so why? (3) the
> lmi-type is ansi and not cisco is it necessary to change it or can it be
> left at its default.
> Can someone please shed some light?
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:44 GMT-3