From: Chuck Larrieu (chuck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Feb 10 2001 - 16:40:36 GMT-3
Anything seem untoward in the following excerpt from a BPB table ( show ip
bgp ) ?
( the mailer will probably trash the formatting. Each route has two
entries - one with a local preference blank, and the other with a local
preference of 1000 )
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 192.168.100.0 10.254.254.6 0 102 603
i
* i 10.254.254.13 1000 0 603 i
*> 192.168.101.0 10.254.254.6 0 102 603
i
* i 10.254.254.13 1000 0
603 i
*> 192.168.102.0 10.254.254.6 0 102 603
i
* i 10.254.254.13 1000 0
603 i
*> 192.168.103.0 10.254.254.6 0 102 603
i
* i 10.254.254.13 1000 0
603 I
based on the indications in the left hand columns, is this what you would
expect? It is not what I would expect.
The router in questions is in AS 405, and his buddy iBGP router in AS 405 is
sending in the local preference value via a route-map.
Chuck
A long shot at passing is better than no shot.
Right now that's all I got to get me through,
So I gotta believe!
( paraphrased from Kathy Baille / Baille and the Boys
a song from several years ago )
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:44 GMT-3