From: Michael Davis (miked@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Feb 08 2001 - 13:27:20 GMT-3
Just an idea -
Seems to me you could redist connected with appropriate filtering and in
order to make that interface pingable but not included in EIGRP network
statements.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon Baxter" <Simon.Baxter@au.logical.com>
To: "Michael E. Flannagan" <mflannag@cisco.com>; "Simon Baxter"
<Simon.Baxter@au.logical.com>
Cc: "Greg Ferro" <gferro@netstarnetworks.com>; "CCIE Group Study (E-mail)"
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 7:40 PM
Subject: RE: Passive interface questions
> problem is, further into the lab it asks to confirm the token can be
pinged.
>
> Maybe the distribution filter should be applied then removed later if it's
> deemed un-necessary.
>
>
> I'm going to go with Justin's answer and assume because the word
"interface"
> is used and there's no mention of route filtering - it's just a
requirement
> for a "passive.."
>
>
> Perhaps as a clean-up when I've finished the lab I'll filter any routes
that
> aren't necessary in any tables....(if I have time!!!)
>
>
> Simon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael E. Flannagan [mailto:mflannag@cisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 9:37 AM
> To: Simon Baxter
> Cc: Greg Ferro; CCIE Group Study (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Passive interface questions
>
>
> I read that as:
>
> Other EIGRP routers should have no clue that there is a token-ring0
> interface. That would require a distribute list, because
> passive-interface just keeps you from sending updates on that
> interface...it doesn't keep you from advertising that interface if it's
> included in the network statement.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> C i s c o S y s t e m s Michael E. Flannagan
> | | Network Consulting Engineer
> ||| ||| Research Triangle Park, NC
> ||||||| ||||||| (919) 392-4550
> .:|||||||||||:.:|||||||||||:. mflannag@cisco.com
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Simon Baxter wrote:
>
> > Can anyone clarify the requirements when a question is worded :
> >
> > "Configure eigrp on the serial link between R1 and R2. Make sure
> > token-ring0 is not included in eigrp"
> >
> > If the serial link network address falls in the same class boundary as
the
> > token, the token network will still advertised even if there's an
> > appropriate passive-interface.
> >
> >
> > Is the question asking you not to send eigrp updates down the link?
> >
> > Or is is asking you to do a distribute-list out (or similar) to exclude
> the
> > token ring network???
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:41 GMT-3