From: Andrew Short (ashort@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Feb 08 2001 - 13:41:02 GMT-3
On the assumption that lab conditions were basiaclly the same everywhere,
I decided to go to RTP because:
1. It was in country.
2. It was the shortest trip.
3. It involcved the least jet lag.
4. I've been to RTP before.
5. I had never been to San jose before and I didn't feel like learning
the area the same time I took the lab.
My second choice would have been Halifax because I hear it's really nice
there. And it still invovles 0 jet lag.
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Christopher Larson wrote:
> I had given this a lot of thought before I scheduled because I to have heard
> the same thing and that some proctors are more lenient etc. I finally
> decided that if I was really prepared and ready that it shouldn't matter
> where I go (note: shouldn't, hopefully won't). Now, even after having said
> that, I have decided to avoid Cali. lol Anyway, I figure that the points I
> might gain by getting one of these supposed "easy" proctors would only be
> helpfull if I was going to pass by within a very small margin. Therefore, in
> my mind it really should not matter if I am actually well prepared for the
> test and know the stuff.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asda fsdaf [mailto:peter_hamesing@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 7:29 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Where to Sit the lab?
>
>
> I've heard stuff that it may be easier to sit the R/S
> lab in some locations than others e.g. Soth Africa.
> Some have said that all locations have standardised
> labs, so it makes no difference where u do them.
> Others argue that some protectors are nicer/easier to
> reason with etc
>
> Any thoghts please?
>
> Peter
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:41 GMT-3