From: lee.dongsik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed Feb 07 2001 - 15:52:05 GMT-3
Yes, it is considered static route. You're probably not allowed to use
it in Lab. An another alternative would be using "ip default-network" on
ASBR, depending upon what's in the target IGRP speaker's routing table
(possibly VLSM/FLSM issue here). Do archive search for Fred Ingham. He
posted some excellent tips regarding this issue. He was my ECPI
instructor, one of the best Cisco instructors I have ever experienced.
- Lee
-----Original Message-----
From: sandyt [mailto:sandyt@cndpro.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 12:01 PM
To: ccielab
Cc: sandyt
Subject: ip route xxxx null0 OSPF IGRP red.
Hello all,
I am redistributing OSPF into IGRP with a network of 170.100.0.0 =
variable subnetted. I have an ethernet interface on my ASBR and the =
subnet is 170.100.42.240 and of course IGRP does not see it.=20
I see two possible scenarios that can happen...
Scenario 1-I could be asked to put the ethernet interface into ospf and
=
redistribute it.
Scenario2- Or the interface is not in the OSPF process.
Scenario 2 can be easily fixed by redistributing connected subnets and a
=
route-map filter to allow network 170.100.42.0 only.
My question is Scenario 1-Can I use the command "ip route 170.100.42.0 =
xxxx null 0" on the exam ? or this is considered static......Is the =
command "summary-address" suppose to work in this scenario if I have it
=
in the ospf process.=20
Cheers,
Sandy T.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:40 GMT-3