From: Larry Roberts (lroberts22@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Feb 06 2001 - 22:58:00 GMT-3
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert DeVito <robertdevito@hotmail.com>
To: <abasinge@swbell.net>; <jim.fitzpatrick@verizon.com>;
<bhescock@cisco.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 7:43 PM
Subject: RE: token switch 3920 config problems
> IBM is my weak spot, but if you where using the same ring number and you
are
> under the same Brf, why would you need to use multiring? I thought
multiring
> will enable the router to look at the RIF information to route between
> different ring numbers or bridge numbers?
>
> Robert
>
>
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: Alan Basinger <abasinge@swbell.net>
> Reply-To: Alan Basinger <abasinge@swbell.net>
> To: jim.fitzpatrick@verizon.com, bhescock@cisco.com
> CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: token switch 3920 config problems
> Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 13:08:18 -0600
>
> Jim,
> You are correct. We were taught this in the ECP1 class.
>
> Alan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> jim.fitzpatrick@verizon.com
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 12:08 PM
> To: bhescock@cisco.com
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: re: token switch 3920 config problems
>
>
> Brian,
>
> I seem to remember from the BRS class that we has a similar problem, the
> solution was to make sure that you either set the 3920 for source-route
> transparent or put 'multiring all' on the router interfaces.
>
> Cheers,
> Jim
> ---------- Original Text ----------
>
> From: "Brian Hescock" <bhescock@cisco.com>, on 2/6/2001 11:38 AM:
>
> Having problems getting two routers to talk using a 3920 switch in the
> middle. Very basic config but it isn't working:
>
> 3920 config
>
> brf 100
> |
> crf 10 (parent is brf 100)
> | |
> port port (ports linked to crf 10)
> 3 4
> | |
> R1 R2
>
> So ports 3 and 4 on the switch are both linked to crf 10, which has a
> parent of brf 100. R1 has an ip address of 10.1.1.1 and R2 and ip
> address of 10.1.1.2, ring speed 16 (that's all). Both are up/up but I'm
> getting encap failed when trying to ping. I wouldn't think I need any
> bridging commands at all on R1 and R2, it should be just like plugging
> into a MAU.
>
> The f'n search engine for the archives isn't working at groupstudy.com
> again, 2nd day in a row (was hoping to find the answer there). Any
> ideas why it wouldn't be working?
>
> Brian
>
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:39 GMT-3