From: niallr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat Feb 03 2001 - 11:20:24 GMT-3
I passed it with a 65 in August (my experience is in the archives). I
was scheduled for Dec. 18 and of course got bumped.
Niall
CCIE #6274
Frank Jimenez wrote:
> I'm not sure this is accurate - last I talked to the scheduler, the closest I
could pin her down to was "more than 10 - less than 100"....
>
> Anyone else going for this?
>
> Frank Jimenez
> franjime@cisco.com
>
> At 11:22 PM 02/02/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>
>> I suppose that I feel special then. Who are the other 4 people? :-)
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> C i s c o S y s t e m s Michael E. Flannagan
>> | | Network Consulting Engineer
>> ||| ||| Research Triangle Park, NC
>> ||||||| ||||||| (919) 392-4550
>> .:|||||||||||:.:|||||||||||:. mflannag@cisco.com
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Mask Of Zorro wrote:
>>
>>> The written will be taken offline soon - Feb 15th I think, for a revision.
>>>
>>> Nobody is passing this thing. There are currently 5 people in the queue for
>>> the lab when it re-opens.
>>>
>>> They made this thing rediculously difficult... It should be a bit easier
>>> when it reappears, probably late spring or early summer.
>>>
>>> Z
>>>
>>>
>>>> From: "Travis Niedens" <tniedens@cisco.com>
>>>> Reply-To: "Travis Niedens" <tniedens@cisco.com>
>>>> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>>>> Subject: CCIE Design Written
>>>> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 15:38:49 -0800
>>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> Any clues how to study for this one ? I took it and got a 48, needed a 60
.
>>>> Covered a lot more than the R/S did. Any help would be appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Travis
>>>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:35 GMT-3