From: Robert DeVito (robertdevito@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Feb 01 2001 - 15:55:24 GMT-3
You all probably all have this URL, but it explains the icanreach and DLSW
filtering. This should answer allot of questions.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/697/dlswfilter.shtml
Robert
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Atif Awan" <atifawan@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: "Atif Awan" <atifawan@hotmail.com>
To: robertdevito@hotmail.com, hardinl@bah.com,
devender.singh@cmc.cwo.net.au, ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: more DLSW question
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 15:27:50
It is a care
>From: "Robert DeVito" <robertdevito@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: "Robert DeVito" <robertdevito@hotmail.com>
>To: hardinl@bah.com, devender.singh@cmc.cwo.net.au, ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: more DLSW question
>Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 15:20:26
>
>I know this will probably start a big thread, but what is the correct
>answer?
>
>Thank you,
>Robert
>
>
>
>----Original Message Follows----
>From: Les Hardin <hardinl@bah.com>
>Reply-To: Les Hardin <hardinl@bah.com>
>To: Devender Singh <devender.singh@cmc.cwo.net.au>,
>"Ccielab@Groupstudy. Com (E-mail)" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: more DLSW question
>Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 22:33:18 -0500
>
>The last time we beat this up I think we came to the conclusion that the
>documentation is in error, and f is a care.
>
>Others may correct me if I'm wrong. (You can count on it! ;-) )
>
>Les
>
>
>At 12:57 PM 2/1/2001 +1100, Devender Singh wrote:
> >Question 1: Ring list. My book shows ring included in ring list command
>as
> >directly attached rings to the router. But can we include rings that
are
>not
> >directly connected.
> >
> >Question 2: In "dlsw icanreach" command if we define a mac-address
>without
> >the mask, it defaults to ffff.ffff.ffff, which in common sense I would
>say
> >will point to only one host. But documentation says that f means don't
>care,
> >which would mean every possible host. This doen't make much sense to
me.
>Can
> >someone enlighten me on this one.
> >
> >Question 3: When I change cost to a remote peer, how do I confirm the
>cost.
> >because " sh dlsw capa " keeps on showing default cost. Or m I missing
> >something here
> >
> >!
> >source-bridge ring-group 10
> >dlsw local-peer peer-id 4.4.4.4 passive
> >dlsw ring-list 1 rings 100
> >dlsw remote-peer 1 tcp 1.1.1.1 cost 2
> >dlsw remote-peer 1 tcp 3.3.3.3 cost 4
> >!
> >****************
> >r4#sh dlsw capa
> >DLSw: Capabilities for peer 1.1.1.1(2065)
> > vendor id (OUI) : '00C' (cisco)
> > version number : 2
> > release number : 0
> > border peer capable : no
> > peer cost : 3 <------- Cost shows up
>as
> >default value
> > UDP Unicast support : yes
> > Fast-switched HPR supp. : no
> > local-ack configured : yes
> > priority configured : no
> > cisco RSVP support : no
> > configured ip address : 1.1.1.1
> > peer type : conf
> > version string :
> >Cisco Inte
> >
> >DLSw: Capabilities for peer 3.3.3.3(2065)
> > vendor id (OUI) : '00C' (cisco)
> > V2 multicast capable : yes
> > peer cost : 3 <------- Cost shows up
>as
> >default value
> > biu-segment configured : no
> > UDP Unicast support : yes
> > Fast-switched HPR supp. : no
> > local-ack configured : yes
> > priority configured : no
> > cisco RSVP support : no
> > configured ip address : 3.3.3.3
> > peer type : conf
> > version string :
> >******************************************************
> >
> >Devender Singh
> >BE(Hons), CCNP
> >IP Solution Specialist
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:33 GMT-3