RE: passive-interface loopback0

From: Devender Singh (devender.singh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jan 31 2001 - 01:02:57 GMT-3

• Next message: Luke Ellezer: "Lab Date Swap - HALIFAX"
• Previous message: Kevin Baumgartner: "Re: Reg ISIS , NLSP,CLNS,voice and ATM"
• Maybe in reply to: Les Hardin: "passive-interface loopback0"
• Next in thread: Justin Menga: "RE: passive-interface loopback0"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
I think processor time.

Devender Singh
BE(Hons), CCNP
IP Solution Specialist

-----Original Message-----
From: Les Hardin [mailto:hardinl@bah.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 31 January 2001 13:08
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: passive-interface loopback0

Hey folks,

What's the benefit of making a loopback interface passive?

e.g.,
router igrp 123
passive-interface loopback0

Does it really matter?

Thanks.

Les

• Next message: Luke Ellezer: "Lab Date Swap - HALIFAX"
• Previous message: Kevin Baumgartner: "Re: Reg ISIS , NLSP,CLNS,voice and ATM"
• Maybe in reply to: Les Hardin: "passive-interface loopback0"
• Next in thread: Justin Menga: "RE: passive-interface loopback0"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:49 GMT-3