From: Jim\(thrupoint\) (jgrina@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jan 30 2001 - 14:04:39 GMT-3
What about RIP across an interface with mismatched timers. Set the announce
time on one side to about five times the other side. The router would go up,
time out, and reappear?
Jim Grina
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Baumgartner" <kbaumgar@cisco.com>
To: <abaskerville@ibeam.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: Interface UP/DOWN
> That's a good one. This type of setup would also be very useful
> for practicing BGP dampening.
>
> Kevin
>
> >
> > How about a BRI running RIP and having the idle timeout set to a few
> > seconds?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sathiaseelan Perumal [mailto:sathia@transition.com.my]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 2:42 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Interface UP/DOWN
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi ,
> >
> > Just wandering ,it there a way to make an interface status change =
> > (up/down) continuously.
> > =20
> > Want to see how the protocols behave.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:48 GMT-3