From: Michael E. Flannagan (mflannag@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jan 29 2001 - 15:39:49 GMT-3
In the event that you can't run out and buy a PIX, the IOS firewall
feature set isn't a bad option. PAT and ACLs are always a good idea, but
not as good as a firewall. :-)
------------------------------------------------------------
C i s c o S y s t e m s Michael E. Flannagan
| | Network Consulting Engineer
||| ||| Research Triangle Park, NC
||||||| ||||||| (919) 392-4550
.:|||||||||||:.:|||||||||||:. mflannag@cisco.com
------------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Frank Wells wrote:
> Get a firewall of sorts. Depending on how many users you need to
> accomodate, you might want to look at the PIX or Checkpoint. As long as you
> are putting a firewall in, you might as well put in some remote access
> security measures too. Both the PIX and the Checkpoint (there are plenty
> more) offer IPSec tunneling as a means of securing users coming into your
> network over the Internet etc.
>
> I cannot vouch for the Checkpoint solution, but a decent PIX like a
> 515/520/525 can handle a significant volume of traffic.
>
>
> >From: David Richard <cisco_lover@usa.net>
> >Reply-To: David Richard <cisco_lover@usa.net>
> >To: cisco@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: NAT or ACL??
> >Date: 29 Jan 2001 03:58:01 MST
> >
> >Hi All,
> >
> >Any body knows whats the best way to protect Internal network from Internet
> >??
> >
> >I found many different answers out of them,Finallyy I have to choose b/w
> >two..
> >
> >NAT or Acces-Lists??
> >
> >ANyh help would be appreciated.
> >
> >DR.
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:47 GMT-3