From: Michael E. Flannagan (mflannag@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jan 29 2001 - 12:03:27 GMT-3
Nope, you'd use FIFO on Ethernet. I wasn't responding to that, I was
simply explaining the meaning of the fair-queue command that the original
poster asked about :-)
------------------------------------------------------------
C i s c o S y s t e m s Michael E. Flannagan
| | Network Consulting Engineer
||| ||| Research Triangle Park, NC
||||||| ||||||| (919) 392-4550
.:|||||||||||:.:|||||||||||:. mflannag@cisco.com
------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Rick Burts wrote:
> Does it make perfect sense to have fair queue on an Ethernet ?
> The advice I have frequently heard is queuing on slower interfaces and
> for high speed interfaces let it go FIFO. Absent some kind of requirement
> for QOS why would you put the overhead of any queuing strategy on a high
> speed interface ?
>
> Rick
>
> Rick Burts, CCSI CCIE 4615 burts@mentortech.com
> Mentor Technologies 240-568-6500 ext 6652
> 133 National Business Parkway 240-568-6515 fax
> Annapolis Junction, Md 20701
>
> Chesapeake Network Solutions has now become Mentor Technologies.
> Mentor Technologies is a certified Cisco Training Partner and also
> a Cisco Professional Services partner.
> We offer most of the Cisco training courses.
> We also offer training in Checkpoint Firewall software and
> Fore Systems (now Marconi) and MicroMuse.
> We also provide network consulting services including
> design, management, and problem solving.
> We have 22 CCIEs on our staff.
> We offer the breakthrough VLAB remote access technology for
> access to pratice configuration on real equipment.
>
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Michael E. Flannagan wrote:
>
> > Yep - it makes perfect sense. They are the max queue depth, max number of
> > dynamic queues and max number of reservable queues (RSVP), respectively.
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > C i s c o S y s t e m s Michael E. Flannagan
> > | | Network Consulting Engineer
> > ||| ||| Research Triangle Park, NC
> > ||||||| ||||||| (919) 392-4550
> > .:|||||||||||:.:|||||||||||:. mflannag@cisco.com
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Murphy, Brennan wrote:
> >
> > > i know that WFQ is on by default on serial lines with bandwidth less
> > > than E1 speeds. But does it make sense to find this command
> > > on an ethernet interface:
> > >
> > > fair queue 64 250 0
> > >
> > > ???
> > >
> > > I browsed around in CCO....couldnt find an answer to this particular
> > > question.
> > >
> > > also, in the interest of conserving space: is there an easy command
> > > to issue on a router to list TCP sessions flowing across the
> > > router from hosts to other hosts?
> > >
> > > thanks!
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:47 GMT-3