From: Robert DeVito (robertdevito@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jan 27 2001 - 19:16:20 GMT-3
On the IOS Feature Navigator. I show mobile IP supported from 12.0.1T
through 12.1.X
Robert
----Original Message Follows----
From: Kevin Baumgartner <kbaumgar@cisco.com>
Reply-To: Kevin Baumgartner <kbaumgar@cisco.com>
To: wayneccie@yahoo.com
CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Mobile IP Dilema
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 11:03:33 -0800 (PST)
Plus I think Mobile IP is a 12.1 not 12.0 feature. And the lab is
using 12.0. So it makes more sense to practice Mobile ARP than Mobile IP.
Kevin
>
> This is Mobile ARP, not Mobile IP.
> 1. To config Mobile ARP, you need EIGRP or OSPF which support host route,
> put ip mobile on the interface, then redistribute mobile to eigrp or ospf
> 2. To config Mobile IP, you need config Home agent and froeign agent. To
> test the Mobile IP, I think you need mobile client software running on
your
> pc.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Chris Mott
> Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2001 1:30 PM
> To: GroupStudy
> Cc: CCIE
> Subject: RE: Mobile IP Dilema
>
>
> I have made it work in a lab environment. I used a Loopback on the far
side
> router (R1) for the subnet, then plugged my laptop into the near side
> Ethernet subnet (R2) to mimic the mobile connection. My IGP was OSPF,
but
> it should work with all VLSM IGP's. My IOS was 12.0.13, desktop version.
> Some requirements:
>
> 1) the original subnet MUST be in the routing table before applying the
> mobile commands
> 2) under the Ethernet interface of R2, type "mobile ip arp"
> 3) In the routing protocol of choice, type "redistribute mobile subnets"
>
> That's it! You have not redistributed the subnets in your configs, nor
> applied the "mobile ip arp" command. Once it is completed, you should
see
> the original subnet in the routing table (for me an "O," for you a "D")
and
> the local IP as an "M" for mobile connection. Then your workstation
should
> be able to ping anything in the routing table.
>
> HTH!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Hebert, Cory J (cory.hebert@wcom.com)
> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 7:41 PM
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: Mobile IP Dilema
>
>
> Hi all-
>
> Well, I've been trying to get Mobile IP (NOT local-area mobility) to work
> but have had no luck so far. Has anyone been able to get this stuff to
> work? I've looked through the archives, and there really aren't any good
> examples out there. The only one is that same one everyone references to
on
> the CD.
>
> Here's my scenario:
>
> e0/0:R2:s0-----------------s1:R3:e0/0
>
> My configs:
>
> R2:
> !
> interface Ethernet0/0
> ip address 1.1.1.3 255.0.0.0
> !
> interface Serial0/0
> ip address 135.5.3.2 255.255.255.0
> clockrate 4000000
> !
> router mobile
> !
> router eigrp 1
> redistribute mobile
> network 1.0.0.0
> network 135.5.0.0
> default-metric 64 100 255 1 1500
> !
> ip mobile home-agent
> ip mobile host 1.1.1.1 interface Ethernet0/0
> !
>
> R3:
> !
> interface Loopback0
> ip address 135.5.6.3 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Ethernet0/0
> ip address 135.5.4.3 255.255.255.0
> ip irdp
> ip mobile foreign-service
> !
> interface Serial0/1
> ip address 135.5.3.3 255.255.255.0
> !
> router mobile
> !
> router eigrp 1
> redistribute mobile
> network 135.5.0.0
> default-metric 64 100 255 1 1500
> !
> ip mobile foreign-agent care-of Loopback0
> !
>
> What I do is take my Windows 98 PC off of R2's ethernet segment, and
> relocate it on R3's ethernet segment.....and no luck whatsoever. All
that
> the mobile debugs came back with was:
>
> r3#
> MobileIP: Ethernet0/0 add 1.1.1.1 rejected
> r3#
> MobileIP: Ethernet0/0 add 1.1.1.1 rejected
> r3#
> MobileIP: Ethernet0/0 add 1.1.1.1 rejected
> r3#
> MobileIP: Ethernet0/0 add 1.1.1.1 rejected
> r3#
>
> I've tried it both with and without the 'redistribute moble' commands
under
> eigrp. Can someone point me in the right direction? Am I missing
something
> here?
>
> Cory
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:45 GMT-3