RE: Lab Troubleshooting Section

From: Ron.Fuller@xxxxxx
Date: Thu Jan 25 2001 - 18:48:21 GMT-3


   

I made it a point to use all of my time to make sure I covered my bases. I
DIDN'T want to make another trip to lovely Halifax. I would recommend
using every bit of time they give you to make sure you do have a happy end
to a long 2 days.

Your mileage may vary, though. I guess it's up to the individual to make
the call.

As for learning your points, I was able to add them in my head when they
reviewed the previous work and told me what I got wrong. Mike in Halifax
was the most helpful proctor I worked with though.

Ron Fuller, CCIE #5851, CCDP, CCNP-ATM, CCNP-Security, CCNP-Voice, MCNE
3X Corporation
rfuller@3x.com

                    "Jason T.

                    Rohm" To: "'Pylko, Eric'" <EPylko@NECBNS
.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
                    <jtrohm@athen cc:

                    et.net> Subject: RE: Lab Troubleshooting S
ection
                    Sent by:

                    nobody@groups

                    tudy.com

                    01/25/2001

                    04:21 PM

                    Please

                    respond to

                    "Jason T.

                    Rohm"

Given that the proctor stoped you, is he/she more active at that point?

Last time I was at RTP and Alan was rarely even in the room.

Thank you,

 Jason T. Rohm
 Sr. Network Engineer
 Wire Technologies, Inc
 jtrohm@wiretech-inc.com
 (920) 766-5172

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Pylko, Eric
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 2:56 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Lab Troubleshooting Section

Where does Cisco say that there are 25 faults in the troubleshooting
section? Just because there are 25 points doesn't mean there are 25
faults.
Day 1 is 45 points isn't it? There's certainly more than 45 things to
configure. Of course, you could say "there are 6 things to configure - 6
routers".

Anyway, I would say keep troubleshooting until time is up or the proctor
says you have found enough problems. The proctor stopped me about 1 1/2
hours into troubleshooting because I had plenty of points to pass.

-Eric

--
Eric Pylko, CCIE #5827
Senior Network Engineer
NEC Business Network Solutions

> -----Original Message----- > From: Earl Aboytes [mailto:Earl@dnssystems.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 3:34 PM > To: 'Jason T. Rohm '; 'CCIELIST (E-mail) ' > Subject: RE: Lab Troubleshooting Section > > > Jason, > I was told my point score before I went into troubleshooting. > I have heard > that they do not tell you sometimes. I am not sure what the > official policy > is. > > Whatever you do don't say to yourself that you only need 20 > points so you > are only going to look for 20 faults. What if you get one or > two wrong or > the proctor doesn't like your reasoning for citing the problem? My > suggestion is to find all 25 faults. If you have to use all > of your time to > find that 25th fault, find it. You don't want to go all that > way and not > pass because you thought you had enough points but didn't. > Earl Aboytes, CCIE 6097 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason T. Rohm > To: CCIELIST (E-mail) > Sent: 1/25/2001 12:13 PM > Subject: Lab Troubleshooting Section > > I have taken the lab once, but did not make it to troubleshooting. > > I know that they have a policy of not telling you your score > at the end > of > day one... do they let you know where you stand (pointwise) > at lunch on > day > two? (I got sent home at that point.) > > The bottom line is... do you know how many faults you need to > correct to > pass? If I had all my points (no likely) it would be kinda silly to > spend > the whole afternoon looking for 25 faults when I only needed > 5 to pass. > > Thank you, > > Jason T. Rohm > Sr. Network Engineer > Wire Technologies, Inc > jtrohm@wiretech-inc.com > (920) 766-5172



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:44 GMT-3