From: EXT-Taylor, Joshua A (Joshua.Taylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jan 23 2001 - 20:29:15 GMT-3
You need to add another route-map statement
route-map filter1 permit 30
!
This will include the networks not affected by access list 1 or 2.
Josh Taylor
Technical Support Analyst
CCDP, CCNP, MCSE
-----Original Message-----
From: Virnoche, Phil [mailto:phil.virnoche@attws.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 3:07 PM
To: CCIE newsgroup (E-mail)
Subject: BGP problem
r3 (BGP 2) ---------------- r4 (BGP 1)
Prior to adding the filter1 out statement I could see both the static routes
on r4 at r3 when i issued an "sh ip bgp" command,.............
After adding the filter, and issuing a "clear ip bgp * " command and letting
the two re-establish, I get nothing at r3..... ideas?
R4:
router bgp 1
bgp log-neighbor-changes
redistribute static
neighbor 10.33.1.65 remote-as 2
neighbor 10.33.1.65 ebgp-multihop 2
neighbor 10.33.1.65 update-source Loopback0
neighbor 10.33.1.65 route-map filter1 out
no auto-summary
!
ip classless
ip route 44.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 Null0
ip route 45.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 Null0
no ip http server
!
access-list 1 permit 41.1.1.0
access-list 2 permit 200.200.200.0
route-map filter1 permit 10
match ip address 1
!
route-map filter1 permit 20
match ip address 2
set metric 5
!
Philip G. Virnoche CCNA
Network Engineer - AT&T Wireless
phone: 425.580.5239
cell: 206.601.3134
"HAM AND EGGS - A day's work for a chicken; A lifetime commitment for a
pig."
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:41 GMT-3